Office Operative Hysteroscopy for the Management of Retained Products of Conception

被引:0
|
作者
Aya Mohr-Sasson
Tomer Gur
Raanan Meyer
Roy Mashiach
David Stockheim
机构
[1] Sheba Medical Center,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[2] Tel-Aviv University,Sackler School of Medicine
来源
Reproductive Sciences | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Office operative hysteroscopy; See and treat hysteroscopy; Retained products of conception; Operative hysteroscopy; Placenta;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare office to conventional operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of retained products of conception (RPOC). This retrospective cohort study included all women who underwent hysteroscopy due to RPOC between January 2018 and December 2019, in a single tertiary medical care center. Exclusion criteria for hysteroscopy included the following: (1) proximity to delivery (up to 3 weeks); (2) hemodynamic instability; (3) active massive bleeding; and (4) genital tract infection. See-and-treat hysteroscopy (study group) outcomes were compared to operative hysteroscopy (controls). Data were collected from women’s medical records. Primary outcome was defined as successful removal of all suspected RPOC with no need for additional intervention. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. During the study period, 222 women underwent hysteroscopy due to RPOC. Of them, 138 (62%) and 84 (38%) underwent see-and-treat and operative hysteroscopy, respectively. Symptomatic women were more commonly referred to operative hysteroscopy (60 (71%) vs. 54 (39%); p = 0.001). Maximal diameter of the suspected finding was smaller both by ultrasound examination (13 (10–18) vs. 18 (13–32) mm; p = 0.001) and by surgeon estimation during diagnostic hysteroscopy (12 (8–20) vs. 20 (14–30) mm; p = 0.001), in the see-and-treat compared to the operative hysteroscopy group, respectively. While comparing success rate between groups, no difference was observed. Sub-analysis by the maximal diameter of RPOC findings revealed that see-and-treat success rate is reduced as the RPOC is larger. Success rate was high and comparable to operative hysteroscopy for findings ≤ 2 cm (102/117 (87%) vs. 49/54 (91%); p = 0.79). Nevertheless, for RPOC > 2 cm, success was significantly more frequent in the operative hysteroscopy group (28/30 (93%) vs. 9/16 (57%); p = 0.002). This finding was supported by logistic regression analysis that found maximal diameter of RPOC as the only parameter associated with success rate (B = 0.96; p = 0.03). Office operative hysteroscopy is a feasible treatment option for the removal of RPOC when maximal diameter is taken under consideration due to its association to success rate.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 767
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Office Operative Hysteroscopy for the Management of Retained Products of Conception
    Mohr-Sasson, Aya
    Gur, Tomer
    Meyer, Raanan
    Mashiach, Roy
    Stockheim, David
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (03) : 761 - 767
  • [2] Operative hysteroscopy for retained products of conception: Efficacy and subsequent fertility
    Capmas, Perrine
    Lobersztajn, Anina
    Duminil, Laura
    Barral, Tiphaine
    Pourcelot, Anne-Gaelle
    Fernandez, Herve
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 48 (03) : 151 - 154
  • [3] See-and-treat in-office hysteroscopy versus operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of retained products of conception: A retrospective study
    Raz, Nili
    Sigal, Emiliya
    Gonzalez Arjona, Fernando
    Calidona, Carmelo
    Garzon, Simone
    Uccella, Stefano
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Haimovich, Sergio
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 48 (09) : 2459 - 2465
  • [4] Hysteroscopic Treatment of Retained Products of Conception Using See and Treat Operative Office Hysteroscopy Without Anesthesia
    Barel, Oshri
    Treger, Sharon
    Sabag, David N.
    Hamu, Batel
    Stolovitch, Natan
    Barak, Shlomi
    Levy, Gil
    Sharvit, Merav
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 32 (03) : 265 - 269
  • [5] Evaluation of fertility after operative hysteroscopy to remove retained products of conception
    Sonnier, Louise
    Torre, Antoine
    Broux, Pauline
    Fauconnier, Arnaud
    Huchon, Cyrille
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 211 : 98 - 102
  • [6] Hysteroscopy and retained products of conception: An update
    Foreste, Virginia
    Gallo, Alessandra
    Manzi, Alfonso
    Riccardi, Carla
    Carugno, Jose
    Sardo, Attilio Di Spiezio
    GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT, 2021, 10 (04): : 203 - 209
  • [7] Reproductive and obstetric outcomes following operative hysteroscopy for treatment of retained products of conception
    Chill, Henry H.
    Safrai, Myriam
    Karavani, Gilad
    Cohen, Adiel
    Alexandroni, Heli
    Bahar, Raz
    Shushan, Asher
    MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 73 (04) : 494 - 499
  • [8] Operative Hysteroscopy to Remove Retained Products of Conception: Novel Treatment of an Old Problem
    Golan, Abraham
    Dishi, Michal
    Shalev, Amir
    Keidar, Ran
    Ginath, Shimon
    Sagiv, Ron
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 18 (01) : 100 - 103
  • [9] Office hysteroscopy in removing retained products of conception - a highly successful approach with minimal complications
    Macek, Katja Jakopic
    Blaganje, Mija
    Suster, Natasa Kenda
    Staric, Kristina Drusany
    Kobal, Borut
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 40 (08) : 1122 - 1126
  • [10] Office hysteroscopy for removal of retained products of conception: can we predict treatment outcome?
    Cohen, A.
    Cohen, Y.
    Sualhi, S.
    Rayman, S.
    Azem, F.
    Rattan, G.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 44 (05): : 683 - 685