Comparison of model building and selection strategies

被引:0
|
作者
Paul F. Doherty
Gary C. White
Kenneth P. Burnham
机构
[1] Colorado State University,Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology
来源
Journal of Ornithology | 2012年 / 152卷
关键词
Akaike’s information criterion; All possible models; Model averaging; Model selection; Multi-model inference; Step-down selection; Stepwise selection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One challenge an analyst often encounters when dealing with complex mark–recapture models is how to limit the number of a priori models. While all possible combinations of model structures on the different parameters (e.g., ϕ, p) can be considered, such a strategy often results in a burdensome number of models, leading to the use of ad hoc strategies to reduce the number of models constructed. For the Cormack–Jolly–Seber data type, one example of an ad hoc strategy is to hold a general ϕ model structure constant while investigating model structures on p, and then to hold the resulting best structure on p constant and investigate structures on ϕ. Many comparable strategies exist. The effect of following ad hoc strategies on parameter estimates as well as for variable selection and whether model averaging can ameliorate any problems are unknown. By means of a simulation study, we have investigated this informational gap by comparing the all-combinations model building strategy with two ad hoc strategies and with truth, as well as considering the results of model averaging. We found that model selection strategy had little effect on parameter estimator bias and precision and that model averaging did improve bias and precision slightly. In terms of variable selection (i.e., cumulative Akaike’s information criterion weights), model sets based on ad hoc strategies did not perform as well as those based on all combinations, as less important variables often had higher weights with the former than with the all possible combinations strategy. Increased sample size resulted in increased variable weights, with an infinite sample size resulting in all variable weights equaling 1 for variables with any predictive influence. Thus, the distinction between statistical importance (dependent on sample size) and biological importance must be recognized when utilizing cumulative weights. We recommend that all-combinations model strategy and model averaging be used. However, if an ad hoc strategy is relied upon to reduce the computational demand, parameter estimates will generally be comparable to the all-combinations strategy, but variable weights will not correspond to the all-combinations strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 323
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of model building and selection strategies
    Doherty, Paul F.
    White, Gary C.
    Burnham, Kenneth P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2012, 152 : S317 - S323
  • [2] A Comparison of Two Strategies for Building an Exposure Prediction Model
    Heiden, Marina
    Mathiassen, Svend Erik
    Garza, Jennifer
    Liv, Per
    Wahlstrom, Jens
    [J]. ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2016, 60 (01): : 74 - 89
  • [3] Examination of tree building and weight selection strategies for a discrete dynamic traffic assignment model
    Yu, L
    [J]. APPLICATIONS OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES IN TRANSPORTATION, 1998, : 207 - 216
  • [4] Comparison of MPC Strategies for Building Control
    Drgona, Jan
    Kvasnica, Michal
    [J]. 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS CONTROL (PC), 2013, : 401 - 406
  • [5] Strategies Comparison in Link Building Problem
    Carchiolo, Vincenza
    Grassia, Marco
    Longheu, Alessandro
    Malgeri, Michele
    Mangioni, Giuseppe
    [J]. INTELLIGENT DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING XIII, 2020, 868 : 197 - 202
  • [6] Selection of competitive strategies of building ceramics industry in China
    Ding Tongwen
    Cheng Guoping
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION & MANAGEMENT, 2005, : 926 - 929
  • [7] Comparison of stepwise covariate model building strategies in population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis
    Wahlby U.
    Jonsson E.N.
    Karlsson M.O.
    [J]. AAPS PharmSci, 4 (4):
  • [8] STRATEGIES OF CYBERNETIC MODEL-BUILDING
    NURMI, H
    [J]. KYBERNETES, 1978, 7 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [9] Strategies of model building in population genetics
    Plutynski, Anya
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2006, 73 (05) : 755 - 764
  • [10] Comparison of restricted selection strategies:: an application to selection of cashmere goats
    Díaz, C
    Toro, MA
    Rekaya, R
    [J]. LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1999, 60 (01): : 89 - 99