Buffering or Aggravating Effect? Examining the Effects of Prior Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Social Irresponsibility

被引:0
|
作者
Zhe Zhang
Mijia Gong
Shanshan Zhang
Ming Jia
机构
[1] Xi’an Jiaotong University,School of Management
[2] Northwestern Polytechnical University,School of Management
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2023年 / 183卷
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Corporate social irresponsibility; Anger; Moral judgment; Investment decision;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prior studies on stakeholders’ responses to firms with high prior corporate social responsibility (CSR) engaging in corporate social irresponsibility (CSIR) show inconsistent results. To explore this inconsistency, we focus on the intentionality of CSIR and draw upon cognitive dissonance theory to examine how transgressional CSIR and accidental CSIR differently influence investors’ responses to firms with high prior CSR through both emotional (e.g., anger) and cognitive (e.g., moral judgment) processes. An experimental study using a facial expression analysis technology— FaceReader 5.0 (Study 1) and a scenario experiment (Study 2), reveal that high prior CSR is a double-edged sword. Specifically, high prior CSR elicits an aggravating effect on investor responses (more anger, more negative moral judgment, and more negative effects on investment) in light of transgressional CSIR, but it has a buffering effect on investor responses (less anger, less negative moral judgment, and less negative effects on investment) in light of accidental CSIR. Moreover, we find that when prior CSR and CSIR are in the same (vs. different) domain, the aggravating effect of transgressional CSIR is strengthened, but the buffering effect of accidental CSIR is weakened. Our findings provide important theoretical and practical insights into the effect of prior CSR on investor responses in cases of different CSIR.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 163
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Buffering or Aggravating Effect? Examining the Effects of Prior Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Social Irresponsibility
    Zhang, Zhe
    Gong, Mijia
    Zhang, Shanshan
    Jia, Ming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2023, 183 (01) : 147 - 163
  • [2] Corporate Social Responsibility for Irresponsibility
    Kotchen, Matthew
    Moon, Jon J.
    [J]. B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, 2012, 12 (01):
  • [3] Examining multi-level effects on corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility
    Mazzei, Matthew J.
    Gangloff, Ashley K.
    Shook, Christoper L.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT & MARKETING-CHALLENGES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY, 2015, 10 (03): : 163 - 184
  • [4] Effects of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility policies
    Armstrong, J. Scott
    Green, Kesten C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2013, 66 (10) : 1922 - 1927
  • [5] Corporate irresponsibility and corporate social responsibility: competing realities
    Jones, Brian
    Bowd, Ryan
    Tench, Ralph
    [J]. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2009, 5 (03) : 300 - +
  • [6] MICROFOUNDATIONS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND IRRESPONSIBILITY
    Shea, Catherine T.
    Hawn, Olga V.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 62 (05): : 1609 - 1642
  • [7] The effects of CEO narcissism on corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility
    Hong, Jin-Ki
    Lee, Ji-Hwan
    Roh, Taewoo
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2022, 43 (06) : 1926 - 1940
  • [8] The joint effect of corporate social irresponsibility and social responsibility on consumer outcomes
    Yue, Cen April
    Tao, Weiting
    Ferguson, Mary Ann
    [J]. EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 41 (05) : 744 - 754
  • [9] LICENSE TO ILL: THE EFFECTS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CEO MORAL IDENTITY ON CORPORATE SOCIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY
    Ormiston, Margaret E.
    Wong, Elaine M.
    [J]. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (04) : 861 - 893
  • [10] Corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility: Introduction to a special topic section
    Murphy, Patrick E.
    Schlegelmilch, Bodo B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2013, 66 (10) : 1807 - 1813