Seasonal influences on livestock keeping in a sedentary crop–livestock system

被引:2
|
作者
Christine Thuranira-McKeever
Alexandra Shaw
Noreen Machila
Mark Eisler
Susan Welburn
Ian Maudlin
机构
[1] Royal Veterinary College,Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies
[2] AP Consultants,undefined
[3] University of Edinburgh,undefined
来源
关键词
Seasonality; Household decision-making; Animal health; Priorities; Livelihood activities;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although seasonality is recognised as an important part of agricultural-based livelihoods, limited literature is available on the subject area, and it is often only alluded to in discussion of other aspects of rural livelihoods. A 2-year longitudinal study to examine the influences of seasonal changes on livestock keeping in a smallholder crop–livestock production system was carried out in Busia District, western Kenya. The study aimed to obtain a picture of yearly variations in household activities and resources, as a means of understanding decisions made by households regarding animal health management, and household times of vulnerability in terms of losing animals. Data collection coincided with the three main seasons in the study area. Information on (inter alia) seasonal livelihood activities, animal health care expenses, numbers of disease episodes and livestock movements into and out of households was collected using questionnaires and participatory rural appraisal methodologies. Farmers suggested clear and consistent seasonal changes and events, but data analyses did not show the patterns expected in relation to livestock keeping. Important observations were made in relation to livestock disease episodes and the use of veterinary services; livestock disease episodes were higher during the long rains than in the dry season, but more money was spent during the dry season when numbers of disease episodes were low, and more households also used professional veterinary services during this season (χ2 = 81.47, P < 0.001). In both study years, a higher proportion of households treated animals themselves during the rainy seasons (z = −2.4, P = 0.02; z = −5.03, P < 0.001).
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 717
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seasonal influences on livestock keeping in a sedentary crop-livestock system
    Thuranira-McKeever, Christine
    Shaw, Alexandra
    Machila, Noreen
    Eisler, Mark
    Welburn, Susan
    Maudlin, Ian
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2010, 42 (04) : 705 - 717
  • [2] Livestock and feed water productivity in the mixed crop-livestock system
    Bekele, M.
    Mengistu, A.
    Tamir, B.
    ANIMAL, 2017, 11 (10) : 1852 - 1860
  • [3] Anthropomorphism - a double edged sword: influences on acceptance of livestock keeping
    Knoerr, Andrea
    Zhou, Xiao
    Bearth, Angela
    Siegrist, Michael
    AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2025, 42 (01) : 441 - 460
  • [4] SEASONAL AND LIVESTOCK INFLUENCES IN ESTIMATING FOLIAGE DENSITY OF VEGETATION
    RITTENHOUSE, LR
    BURZLAFF, DF
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1968, 21 (05): : 297 - +
  • [5] KEEPING TRACK OF LIVESTOCK
    不详
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1995, 136 (16) : 401 - 402
  • [6] A study on crop-livestock integration system
    Parthasarathy, R
    Chandrasekaran, B
    Gajendran, K
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1996, 66 (02): : 206 - 208
  • [7] Celebrating livestock keeping in Scotland
    不详
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2022, 191 (12) : 486 - 486
  • [8] Keeping livestock farmers in business
    Hannah, HW
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 212 (03) : 356 - 357
  • [9] Definitions and terminologies for Integrated Crop-Livestock System
    de Faccio Carvalho, Paulo Cesar
    de Moraes, Anibal
    Pontes, Laise da Silveira
    Anghinoni, Ibanor
    Sulc, Reuben Mark
    Batello, Caterina
    REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA, 2014, 45 (05): : 1040 - 1046
  • [10] Economic viability of a crop-livestock integration system
    Brandao Vinholis, Marcela de Mello
    de Souza Filho, Hildo Meirelles
    Shimata, Isabela
    Anchao Oliveira, Patricia Perondi
    Pedroso, Andre de Faria
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2021, 51 (02):