The influence of contrast and spatial factors in the perceived shape of boundaries

When an edge can be perceived to continue either with a collinear edge of the opposite contrast polarity or with a noncollinear edge of the same contrast polarity, observers perceive an alignment between the edges of the same contrast polarity, even though they are noncollinear. Using several stimulus configurations and both free and tachistoscopic viewing, we studied the luminance and spatial factors affecting the perceived distortion and binding. The results showed that the two noncollinear edges tended to align when they had the same contrast polarity (Experiment 1A) and to misalign when they had opposite contrast polarity (Experiment 2), providing that (1) they were separated by a distance larger than 1 arcmin and smaller than 3–4 arcmin (for all configurations) and (2) they laterally overlapped for about 7 arcmin (Experiment 1B). The results also showed that the direction of apparent distortion depended on the direction of overlapping. The results of Experiment 3 ruled out the localattraction/repulsion explanation but, instead, supported the suggestion that the interactionconcerned the global edges, or part of them, and produced aninward tilt, which made the edges of the same contrast polarity perceptually to align, or anoutward tilt, so that the edges of opposite contrast polarity were perceived to be more misaligned. From the overlap and distance limits found, it can be inferred that for two noncollinear contours to join perceptually, the tilt must not exceed 18°, a limit compatible with the orientation bandwidth of contrast-sensitive early cortical mechanisms.