共 14 条
- [1] “Specsavers”Council Regulation (EC) No. 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community Trade Mark, Arts. 9(1)(b) and (c), 15(1), 51(1)(a) – Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd, Specsavers BV, Specsavers Optical Group Ltd and Specsavers Optical Superstores Ltd v. Asda Stores Ltd IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2014, 45 (3) : 368 - 368
- [2] “F.C.I.”Council Regulation (EC) No. 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community Trade Mark, Art. 9(1) – Fédération Cynologique Internationale v. Federación Caninca Internacional de Perros de Pura Raza IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2013, 44 (7) : 860 - 860
- [3] “Red Bull v. Pit Bull”Jurisdiction Regulation, Art. 6(1); Regulation (EC) No. 207/2009 on the Community Trade Mark, Arts. 9(1)(c), 94(1); Trade Mark Act, Sec. 10(2); Act Against Unfair Competition, Sec. 1 IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2014, 45 (4) : 472 - 478
- [4] Red Bull v. Pit Bul Jurisdiction Regulation, Art. 6(1); Regulation (EC) No. 207/2009 on the Community Trade Mark, Arts. 9(1)(c), 94(1); Trade Mark Act, Sec. 10(2); Act Against Unfair Competition, Sec. 1 IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2014, 45 (04) : 472 - 478
- [5] “Innoweb”Directive No. 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the Legal Protection of Databases, Art. 7(1) and (5) – Innoweb BV v. Wegener ICT Media BV and Wegener Mediaventions BV IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2014, 45 (4) : 465 - 465
- [6] ''Innoweb'' Directive No. 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the Legal Protection of Databases, Art. 7(1) and (5) - Innoweb BV v. Wegener ICT Media BV and Wegener Mediaventions BV IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2014, 45 (04) : 465 - 465
- [8] “Wir Machen Das Besondere Einfach”Council Regulation (EC) No. 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community Trade Mark, Art. 7(1)(b) – Smart Technologies ULC v. Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2013, 44 (6) : 730 - 730
- [9] “Formula 1”Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community Trade Mark, Article 8 – Formula One Licensing BV v. Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Global Sports Media Ltd. IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2013, 44 (5) : 611 - 611
- [10] “Majtczak v. Feng Shen Technology and OHIM”Council Regulation (EC) No. 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community Trade Mark, Art. 51(1)(b) – Jarosław Majtczak v. Feng Shen Technology Co. Ltd and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2014, 45 (3) : 367 - 367