A multicentre cross-sectional survey study on acute wound classification in the emergency department and its interobserver variability

被引:0
|
作者
Lisanne van Gennip
Frederike J. C. Haverkamp
Özcan Sir
Edward C. T. H. Tan
机构
[1] Radboudumc,Department of Surgery
[2] Radboudumc,Department of Emergency Medicine
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Annually, a vast number of patients visits the emergency department for acute wounds. Many wound classification systems exist, but often these were not originally designed for acute wounds. This study aimed to assess the most frequently used classifications for acute wounds in the Netherlands and the interobserver variability of the Gustilo Anderson wound classification (GAWC) and Red Cross wound classification (RCWC) in acute wounds. This multicentre cross-sectional survey study employed an online oral questionnaire. We contacted emergency physicians from eleven hospitals in the south-eastern part of the Netherlands and identified the currently applied classifications. Participants classified ten fictitious wounds by applying the GAWC and RCWC. Afterwards, they rated the user-friendliness of these classifications. We examined the interobserver variability of both classifications using a Fleiss’ kappa analysis, with a subdivision in RCWC grades and types representing wound severity and injured tissue structures. The study included twenty emergency physicians from eight hospitals. Fifty percent of the participants reported using a classification for acute wounds, mostly the GAWC. The interobserver variability of the GAWC (κ = 0.46; 95% CI 0.44–0.49) and RCWC grades (κ = 0.56; 95% CI 0.53–0.59) was moderate, and it was good for the RCWC types (κ = 0.69; 95% CI 0.66–0.73). Participants considered both classifications helpful for acute wound assessment when the emergency physician was less experienced, despite a moderate user-friendliness. The GAWC was only of additional value in wounds with fractures, whereas the RCWC’s additional value in acute wound assessment was independent of the presence of a fracture. Emergency physicians are reserved to use a classification for acute wound assessment. The interobserver variability of the GAWC and RCWC in acute wounds is promising, and both classifications are easy to apply. However, their user-friendliness is moderate. It is recommended to apply the GAWC to acute wounds with underlying fractures and the RCWC to major traumatic injuries. Awareness should be raised of existing wound classifications, specifically among less experienced healthcare professionals.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multicentre cross-sectional survey study on acute wound classification in the emergency department and its interobserver variability
    van Gennip, Lisanne
    Haverkamp, Frederike J. C.
    Sir, Ozcan
    Tan, Edward C. T. H.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [2] Cross-sectional study of carbon monoxide alarm use in patients attending the emergency department: a multicentre survey protocol
    Jarman, Heather
    Atkinson, Richard W.
    Babu, Ashik
    Moss, Phil
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [3] Acute Headache Presentations to the Emergency Department: A Statewide Cross-sectional Study
    Chu, Kevin H.
    Howell, Tegwen E.
    Keijzers, Gerben
    Furyk, Jeremy S.
    Eley, Robert M.
    Kinnear, Frances B.
    Thom, Ogilvie
    Mahmoud, Ibrahim
    Brown, Anthony F. T.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 24 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [4] Acceptability of Contraceptive Services in the Emergency Department: A Cross-sectional Survey
    Alexander, Andreia B.
    Chernoby, Kimberly
    VanderVinne, Nathan
    Doost, Yancy
    Kaurt, Navneet
    Bernard, Caitlin
    Kline, Jeffrey A.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (03) : 769 - 774
  • [5] Cross-sectional study on emergency department management of sepsis
    Hung, Kevin K. C.
    Lam, Rex P. K.
    Lo, Ronson S. L.
    Tenney, Justin W.
    Yang, Marc L. C.
    Tai, Marcus C. K.
    Graham, Colin A.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (06) : 571 - 578
  • [6] Parenteral nutrition in emergency surgery: A multicentre cross-sectional study
    Ashmore, Daniel
    Lee, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2022, 35 (01) : 5 - 13
  • [7] A cross-sectional emergency department survey of novel psychoactive substance prevalence
    Fockele, Callan
    Armenian, Patil
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (10): : 1580 - 1580
  • [8] The influence of coronavirus disease 2019 on emergency department visits in Nanjing, China: A multicentre cross-sectional study
    Sun, Hao
    Liu, Keqin
    Li, Meng
    Tang, Shaowen
    Monte, Andrew A.
    Wang, Jun
    Nie, Shinan
    Rui, Qinglin
    Liu, Wenge
    Qin, Haidong
    Tan, Xiao
    Ni, Haibin
    Yang, Wenxin
    Zhu, Congjian
    Yang, Runhua
    Yu, Tianhao
    Wang, Shengwei
    Jiang, Hao
    Chen, Xiaofeng
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhu, Yi
    Zhao, Huatou
    Yang, Shiyu
    Yin, Kejin
    Shao, Danbing
    Xiao, Liang
    Chen, Zhengwei
    Yuan, Weizhong
    Hu, Dongdong
    Wan, Xiaoyong
    Wu, Lanfu
    Zhang, Jinsong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (10): : 2101 - 2109
  • [9] Stressors for emergency department nurses: Insights from a cross-sectional survey
    Alomari, Ali H.
    Collison, James
    Hunt, Leanne
    Wilson, Nathan J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2021, 30 (7-8) : 975 - 985
  • [10] Clinical and sociodemographic profile of acute intoxications in an emergency department: A retrospective cross-sectional study
    Jose Aguilon-Leiva, Juan
    Isabel Tejada-Garrido, Clara
    Echaniz-Serrano, Emmanuel
    Mir-Ramos, Eduardo
    Manuel Torres-Perez, Antonio
    Lafuente-Jimenez, Alberto
    Martinez-Soriano, Maria
    Santolalla-Arnedo, Ivan
    Czapla, Michal
    Smereka, Jacek
    Juarez-Vela, Raul
    Jose Satustegui-Dorda, Pedro
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10