Who Said What? The Effects of Source Cues in Issue Frames

被引:1
|
作者
Todd K. Hartman
Christopher R. Weber
机构
[1] Appalachian State University,Department of Government and Justice Studies
[2] Louisiana State University,Department of Political Science, Manship School of Mass Communication
来源
Political Behavior | 2009年 / 31卷
关键词
Framing; Attitude change; Persuasion; Source cues; Competitive framing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drawing on previous research concerning the role that source cues play in political information processing, we examine whether an ideological identity match between the source of a framed message and the respondent moderates framing effects. We test our hypotheses in two experiments concerning attitudes toward a proposed rally by the Ku Klux Klan. In Experiment 1 (N = 274), we test our hypothesis in a simple issue framing experiment. We find that framing effects occur for strong identifiers only when there is a match between the ideology of the speaker and respondent. In Experiment 2 (N = 259), we examine whether matched frames resonate equally well when individuals are simultaneously exposed to competing frames. The results from this experiment provide mixed support for our hypotheses. The results from our studies suggest that identity matching is an important factor to consider in future framing research.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 558
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Who Said What? The Effects of Source Cues in Issue Frames
    Hartman, Todd K.
    Weber, Christopher R.
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2009, 31 (04) : 537 - 558
  • [2] The Effects of Source Cues and Issue Frames During COVID-19
    Case, Chandler
    Eddy, Christopher
    Hemrajani, Rahul
    Howell, Christopher
    Lyons, Daniel
    Sung, Yu-Hsien
    Connors, Elizabeth C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (03) : 369 - 378
  • [3] Remembering who said what: Effects of source credibility and content consistency
    Rouet, Jean-Francois
    Le Bigot, Ludovic
    Coutieras, Anthony
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 402 - 402
  • [4] WHO SAID WHAT - ERP MEASURES OF SOURCE AND ITEM MEMORY
    SENKFOR, AJ
    VANPETTEN, C
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 32 : S69 - S69
  • [5] WHO SAID WHAT
    FRIEDBERG, M
    [J]. PROBLEMS OF COMMUNISM, 1959, 8 (05): : 60 - 60
  • [6] Who said what?
    Robert Walgate
    [J]. Genome Biology, 1 (1):
  • [7] A fmri investigation of source memory and interference in the 'who said what'? Paradigm
    Dodson, C
    Stefanucci, J
    Darling, B
    Hege, A
    Proffitt, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, : 240 - 240
  • [8] WHO SAID WHAT WHEN
    BRODIN, MB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1982, 8 (09): : 728 - 728
  • [9] Source monitoring among multiple virtual agents: A study of who said what
    Craig, SD
    Hu, XG
    Marks, W
    Graesser, AC
    [J]. ADVANCED RESEARCH IN COMPUTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS IN EDUCATION, VOL 1: NEW HUMAN ABILITIES FOR THE NETWORKED SOCIETY, 1999, 55 : 141 - 148
  • [10] GALES QUOTATIONS - WHO SAID WHAT
    BATES, ME
    [J]. DATABASE-THE MAGAZINE OF ELECTRONIC DATABASE REVIEWS, 1995, 18 (04): : 112 - 112