The decomposition and policy meaning of China’s carbon emission intensity

被引:2
|
作者
Jinhe Jiang
机构
[1] Institute of Quantitative and Technical Economics,
[2] CASS,undefined
关键词
Carbon emission intensity; Per capita carbon emission; Final carbon emission; Energy policy; Divisia index decomposition; Q58;
D O I
10.1007/s40844-016-0062-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Economic policy and energy policy are two major factors of energy consumption and carbon emissions in China. This paper analyzed China’s carbon emission intensity from two perspectives: per capita carbon emission of primary energy (CEPE) and final carbon emission intensity (FCEI), that is, final carbon emission per unit of GDP. Based on the latest available China statistics data, Divisia decomposition was applied to decompose the changes of carbon emission intensity. Study results showed that economic policy and energy policy factors in different periods impact on carbon intensity change and contribution rates are different. In terms of per capita CEPE, the level of economic development is major factors of per capita CEPE increase, which is increased by 309% and improved by 4.7 tCO2 during 1980–2012, where economic development promoted to increase per capita CEPE with contribution rate of 215.7%, while energy efficiency and structural changes played a role in reducing carbon emissions per capita. For analysis of FCEI which reduced by 52% during 1996–2012, energy efficiency is the main determinant of reduced emission intensity with the contribution rate of 106%, followed by the structural change of energy, while changes of industrial structure promote carbon emission intensity improvements. Thus, economic policy, energy policy in the different impacts on carbon emissions, and the contribution rate are different, and finally, preliminary recommendation and policy reflection for energy development policy were concluded.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 310
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] China's regional carbon emission intensity decomposition system
    Liu, Wei-Xu
    Wang, Qian
    Liang, Qiao-Mei
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    Zhao, Lu-Tao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ENERGY ISSUES, 2014, 37 (5-6) : 319 - 337
  • [2] China's carbon intensity factor decomposition and carbon emission decoupling analysis
    Pan, Xiongfeng
    Guo, Shucen
    Xu, Haitao
    Tian, Mengyuan
    Pan, Xianyou
    Chu, Junhui
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 239
  • [3] The Abatement of Carbon Dioxide Intensity in China: Factors Decomposition and Policy Implications
    Chen, Shiyi
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2011, 34 (07): : 1148 - 1167
  • [4] Exploring Change in China's Carbon Intensity: A Decomposition Approach
    Du, Kerui
    Lin, Boqiang
    Xie, Chunping
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (02)
  • [5] Can China's policy of carbon emission trading promote carbon emission reduction?
    Xuan, Dong
    Ma, Xiaowei
    Shang, Yuping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 270
  • [6] Carbon emission intensity and biased technical change in China’s different regions: a novel multidimensional decomposition approach
    Lili Ding
    Kaixuan Zhang
    Ying Yang
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 38083 - 38096
  • [7] Decomposition and prediction of China's carbon emission intensity towards carbon neutrality: From perspectives of national, regional and sectoral level
    Chen, Hao
    Qi, Shaozhou
    Tan, Xiujie
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 825
  • [8] Carbon emission intensity and biased technical change in China's different regions: a novel multidimensional decomposition approach
    Ding, Lili
    Zhang, Kaixuan
    Yang, Ying
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (25) : 38083 - 38096
  • [9] Why does China ?s carbon intensity decline and India ?s carbon intensity rise? a decomposition analysis on the sectors
    Wang, Qiang
    Wang, Shasha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 265
  • [10] Effects of China's environmental policy on carbon emission efficiency
    Pan, Xiongfeng
    Pan, Xianyou
    Li, Changyu
    Song, Jinbo
    Zhang, Jing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 11 (03) : 326 - 340