Multi-objective Optimization for Materials Discovery via Adaptive Design

被引:0
|
作者
Abhijith M. Gopakumar
Prasanna V. Balachandran
Dezhen Xue
James E. Gubernatis
Turab Lookman
机构
[1] Theoretical Division,Los Alamos National Laboratory
[2] Xian Jiaotong University,State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Guiding experiments to find materials with targeted properties is a crucial aspect of materials discovery and design, and typically multiple properties, which often compete, are involved. In the case of two properties, new compounds are sought that will provide improvement to existing data points lying on the Pareto front (PF) in as few experiments or calculations as possible. Here we address this problem by using the concept and methods of optimal learning to determine their suitability and performance on three materials data sets; an experimental data set of over 100 shape memory alloys, a data set of 223 M2AX phases obtained from density functional theory calculations, and a computational data set of 704 piezoelectric compounds. We show that the Maximin and Centroid design strategies, based on value of information criteria, are more efficient in determining points on the PF from the data than random selection, pure exploitation of the surrogate model prediction or pure exploration by maximum uncertainty from the learning model. Although the datasets varied in size and source, the Maximin algorithm showed superior performance across all the data sets, particularly when the accuracy of the machine learning model fits were not high, emphasizing that the design appears to be quite forgiving of relatively poor surrogate models.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-objective Optimization for Materials Discovery via Adaptive Design
    Gopakumar, Abhijith M.
    Balachandran, Prasanna V.
    Xue, Dezhen
    Gubernatis, James E.
    Lookman, Turab
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [2] Rapid discovery of promising materials via active learning with multi-objective optimization
    Park, Taehyun
    Kim, Eunsong
    Sun, Jiwon
    Kim, Minseon
    Hong, Eunhwa
    Min, Kyoungmin
    MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 37
  • [3] Adaptive Multi-Objective Optimization Based on Feedback Design
    窦立谦
    宗群
    吉月辉
    曾凡琳
    Transactions of Tianjin University, 2010, (05) : 359 - 365
  • [4] Adaptive Multi-Objective Optimization Based on Feedback Design
    窦立谦
    宗群
    吉月辉
    曾凡琳
    Transactions of Tianjin University, 2010, 16 (05) : 359 - 365
  • [5] Adaptive multi-objective optimization based on feedback design
    Dou L.
    Zong Q.
    Ji Y.
    Zeng F.
    Transactions of Tianjin University, 2010, 16 (5) : 359 - 365
  • [6] MULTI-OBJECTIVE PERFORMANCE DESIGN OF INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE VIA A NEW MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM
    Ding, Li-ping
    Tan, Jian-rong
    Wei, Zhe
    Chen, Wen-liang
    Gao, Zhan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2011, 7 (7A): : 3939 - 3949
  • [7] Robust multi-objective controller design via convex optimization
    Masubuchi, I
    Osaka, A
    Suda, N
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-4, 1996, : 263 - 264
  • [8] Uniform mixture design via evolutionary multi-objective optimization
    Menchaca-Mendez, Adriana
    Zapotecas-Martinez, Saul
    Miguel Garcia-Velazquez, Luis
    Coello Coello, Carlos A.
    SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2022, 68
  • [9] Multi-objective Optimization for Plant Design via Tabu Search
    Mandani, Faiz
    Camarda, Kyle
    28TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2018, 43 : 543 - 548
  • [10] An adaptive multi-objective optimization method for optimum design of distribution networks
    Mohamadi, Mohamad Reza
    Abedini, Mohammad
    Rashidi, Bahram
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2020, 52 (02) : 194 - 217