Incentive effects of class actions and punitive damages under alternative procedural regimes

被引:0
|
作者
Marta Cenini
Barbara Luppi
Francesco Parisi
机构
[1] University of Milan,Faculty of Law
[2] University of Modena and Reggio Emilia,Faculty of Economics
[3] University of Minnesota,Law School
[4] University of Bologna,Faculty of Economics
来源
关键词
Punitive damages; Class actions; Loser-Pays rule; Incentives; K13; K4;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In an economic perspective, punitive damages and class actions can be viewed as sharing a common economic function—creating optimal deterrence. Building on Parisi and Cenini (Class actions for Europe: perspectives from law and economics, ELGAR, 2010), we study the effect of alternative procedural regimes on the effectiveness of punitive damages and class actions. Specifically, we compare the workings of punitive damages and class actions in the American and English (“loser-pays”) regimes. Our findings help explain the limited use and late adoption of class actions and punitive damages in Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 240
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条