Gender and property rights in the commons: Examples of water rights in South Asia

被引:48
|
作者
Zwarteveen M. [1 ,3 ]
Meinzen-Dick R. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sub-department of Irrigation and Water Engineering, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen
[2] International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC
[3] Sub-Department of Irrigation and Water Engineering, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen 6709 PA
[4] International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC 20006
关键词
Common property; Devolution; Gender; Irrigation; Property rights; Water users' associations;
D O I
10.1023/A:1007677317899
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In many countries and resource sectors, the state is devolving responsibility for natural resource management responsibility to "communities" or local user groups. However, both policymakers and researchers in this area have tended to ignore the implications of gender and other forms of intra-community power differences for the effectiveness and equity of natural resource management. In the irrigation sector, despite the rhetoric on women's participation, a review of evidence from South Asia shows that organizations often exclude women through formal or informal membership rules and practices. Women may have other ways to obtain irrigation services, but even if they are effective, these other informal ways of obtaining irrigation services are typically less secure. As resource management - and rights to resources - are transferred from the state to local organizations, ensuring women's participation is essential for gender equity in control over resources. Greater involvement of women can also strengthen the effectiveness of local organizations by improving women's compliance with rules and maintenance contributions. Further detailed and comparative research is required to identify the major factors that affect women's participation and control over resources, if devolution policies are to be both equitable and sustainable. © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 25
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Property Rights and Forest Commons
    Coleman, Eric A.
    Liebertz, Scott S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 33 (03) : 649 - 668
  • [2] Gender Discrimination in Property Rights: Six Centuries of Commons Governance in the Alps
    Casari, Marco
    Lisciandra, Maurizio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 2016, 76 (02): : 559 - 594
  • [3] Credit Markets, Property Rights, and the Commons
    Noack, Frederik
    Costello, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2024, 132 (07) : 2396 - 2450
  • [4] Water rights, conflicts, and justice in South Asia
    Roth, Dik
    Zwarteveen, Margreet
    Joy, K. J.
    Kulkarni, Seema
    [J]. LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 19 (09) : 947 - 953
  • [5] Spectrum Management: Property Rights, Markets, and the Commons
    Faulhaber, Gerald R.
    Farber, David J.
    [J]. RETHINKING RIGHTS AND REGULATIONS: INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSES TO NEW COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, 2003, : 193 - 226
  • [6] Understanding Property Rights in the Contemporary Urban Commons
    Boydell, Spike
    Searle, Glen
    [J]. URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2014, 32 (03) : 323 - 340
  • [7] Locke, intellectual property rights, and the information commons
    Tavani H.T.
    [J]. Ethics and Information Technology, 2005, 7 (2) : 87 - 97
  • [8] Conclusion The revival of the "commons" and the redefinition of property rights
    De Schutter, Olivier
    Rajagopal, Balakrishnan
    [J]. PROPERTY RIGHTS FROM BELOW: COMMODIFICATION OF LAND AND THE COUNTER-MOVEMENT, 2020, : 203 - 232
  • [9] Does the allocation of property rights matter in the commons
    Leibbrandt, Andreas
    Lynham, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 89 : 201 - 217
  • [10] Ostrom's Law: Property Rights in the Commons
    Fennell, Lee Anne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2011, 5 (01): : 9 - 27