Equal fitness paradigm explained by a trade-off between generation time and energy production rate

被引:0
|
作者
James H. Brown
Charles A. S. Hall
Richard M. Sibly
机构
[1] University of New Mexico,Department of Biology
[2] State University of New York – College of Environmental Science and Forestry,Department of Forest and Environmental Biology and Program in Environmental Science
[3] University of Reading,School of Biological Sciences
[4] 636 Piney Way,undefined
[5] 26242 Montana Highway 35,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Most plant, animal and microbial species of widely varying body size and lifestyle are nearly equally fit as evidenced by their coexistence and persistence through millions of years. All organisms compete for a limited supply of organic chemical energy, derived mostly from photosynthesis, to invest in the two components of fitness: survival and production. All organisms are mortal because molecular and cellular damage accumulates over the lifetime; life persists only because parents produce offspring. We call this the equal fitness paradigm. The equal fitness paradigm occurs because: (1) there is a trade-off between generation time and productive power, which have equal-but-opposite scalings with body size and temperature; smaller and warmer organisms have shorter lifespans but produce biomass at higher rates than larger and colder organisms; (2) the energy content of biomass is essentially constant, ~22.4 kJ g−1 dry body weight; and (3) the fraction of biomass production incorporated into surviving offspring is also roughly constant, ~10–50%. As organisms transmit approximately the same quantity of energy per gram to offspring in the next generation, no species has an inherent lasting advantage in the struggle for existence. The equal fitness paradigm emphasizes the central importance of energy, biological scaling relations and power–time trade-offs in life history, ecology and evolution.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 268
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Equal fitness paradigm explained by a trade-off between generation time and energy production rate
    Brown, James H.
    Hall, Charles A. S.
    Sibly, Richard M.
    [J]. NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2018, 2 (02): : 262 - +
  • [2] Are all eggs created equal? Food availability and the fitness trade-off between reproduction and immunity
    Stahlschmidt, Zachary R.
    Rollinson, Njal
    Acker, Madison
    Adamo, Shelley A.
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 27 (03) : 800 - 806
  • [3] On the trade-off between rate and reliability for secret key generation in wireless channels
    Sandell, Magnus
    [J]. SECURITY AND PRIVACY, 2024,
  • [4] Fitness optimization of Daphnia in a trade-off between food and temperature
    Kessler, K
    Lampert, W
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 2004, 140 (03) : 381 - 387
  • [5] Fitness optimization of Daphnia in a trade-off between food and temperature
    Kirsten Kessler
    Winfried Lampert
    [J]. Oecologia, 2004, 140 : 381 - 387
  • [6] A trade-off between diapause duration and fitness in female parasitoids
    Ellers, J
    van Alphen, JJM
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2002, 27 (03) : 279 - 284
  • [7] Trade-off between energy and entropy of information
    Gorecki, H
    [J]. CONTROL AND CYBERNETICS, 1997, 26 (02): : 215 - 225
  • [8] The energy trade-off between growth and longevity
    Hou, Chen
    [J]. MECHANISMS OF AGEING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 134 (09) : 373 - 380
  • [9] Generation Time Measures the Trade-Off between Survival and Reproduction in a Life Cycle
    Giaimo, Stefano
    Traulsen, Arne
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2019, 194 (02): : 285 - 290
  • [10] IS THERE A TRADE-OFF BETWEEN LEVEL OF EMPLOYMENT AND RATE OF INFLATION
    LUNDVALL, BA
    [J]. NATIONALOKONOMISK TIDSSKRIFT, 1974, 112 (03): : 395 - 407