The impact of time and field conditions on brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA amplification

被引:0
|
作者
Melanie A. Murphy
Katherine C. Kendall
Andrew Robinson
Lisette P. Waits
机构
[1] University of Idaho,Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources
[2] Washington State University,School of Biological Sciences
[3] Glacier Field Station,USGS Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center
[4] University of Idaho,Department of Forest Resources
[5] University of Melbourne,Department of Mathematics and Statistics
来源
Conservation Genetics | 2007年 / 8卷
关键词
DNA preservation; Faecal DNA; Noninvasive genetic sampling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To establish longevity of faecal DNA samples under varying summer field conditions, we collected 53 faeces from captive brown bears (Ursus arctos) on a restricted vegetation diet. Each faeces was divided, and one half was placed on a warm, dry field site while the other half was placed on a cool, wet field site on Moscow Mountain, Idaho, USA. Temperature, relative humidity, and dew point data were collected on each site, and faeces were sampled for DNA extraction at <1, 3, 6, 14, 30, 45, and 60 days. Faecal DNA sample viability was assessed by attempting PCR amplification of a mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) locus (∼150 bp) and a nuclear DNA (nDNA) microsatellite locus (180–200 bp). Time in the field, temperature, and dew point impacted mtDNA and nDNA amplification success with the greatest drop in success rates occurring between 1 and 3 days. In addition, genotyping errors significantly increased over time at both field sites. Based on these results, we recommend collecting samples at frequent transect intervals and focusing sampling efforts during drier portions of the year when possible.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / 1224
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of time and field conditions on brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA amplification
    Murphy, Melanie A.
    Kendall, Katherine C.
    Robinson, Andrew
    Waits, Lisette P.
    [J]. CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2007, 8 (05) : 1219 - 1224
  • [2] The influence of diet on faecal DNA amplification and sex identification in brown bears (Ursus arctos)
    Murphy, MA
    Waits, LP
    Kendall, KC
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2003, 12 (08) : 2261 - 2265
  • [3] Physiology of the European brown bear (Ursus arctos arctos)
    Hissa, R
    [J]. ANNALES ZOOLOGICI FENNICI, 1997, 34 (04) : 267 - 287
  • [4] An evaluation of long-term preservation methods for brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA samples
    Melanie A. Murphy
    Lisette P. Waits
    Katherine C. Kendall
    Samuel K. Wasser
    Jerry A. Higbee
    Robert Bogden
    [J]. Conservation Genetics, 2002, 3 : 435 - 440
  • [5] An evaluation of long-term preservation methods for brown bear (Ursus arctos) faecal DNA samples
    Murphy, MA
    Waits, LP
    Kendall, KC
    Wasser, SK
    Higbee, JA
    Bogden, R
    [J]. CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2002, 3 (04) : 435 - 440
  • [6] The mating system of the brown bear Ursus arctos
    Steyaert, Sam M. J. G.
    Endrestol, Anders
    Hacklaender, Klaus
    Swenson, Jon E.
    Zedrosser, Andreas
    [J]. MAMMAL REVIEW, 2012, 42 (01) : 12 - 34
  • [7] Brown bear Ursus arctos scavenging patterns
    Elgmork, Kare
    Tjorve, Even
    [J]. WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 1995, 1 (04) : 239 - 242
  • [8] Inbreeding depression in brown bear Ursus arctos
    Laikre, L
    Andren, R
    Larsson, HO
    Ryman, N
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1996, 76 (01) : 69 - 72
  • [9] Ancient DNA analysis reveals divergence of the cave bear, Ursus spelaeus, and brown bear, Ursus arctos, lineages
    Loreille, O
    Orlando, L
    Patou-Mathis, M
    Philippe, M
    Taberlet, P
    Hänni, C
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (03) : 200 - 203
  • [10] HUMAN IMPACT ON A BROWN BEAR POPULATION (URSUS-ARCTOS L)
    ELGMORK, K
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1978, 13 (02) : 81 - 103