A Review of Diagnostic Techniques in the Differential Diagnosis of Epileptic and Nonepileptic Seizures

被引:0
|
作者
Dona E. Cragar
David T. R. Berry
Toufic A. Fakhoury
Jean E. Cibula
Frederick A. Schmitt
机构
[1] University of Kentucky Medical Center,Department of Psychology
[2] University of Kentucky Medical Center,Department of Neurology
[3] Mount Carmel Medical Center,Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Psychology, and Behavioral Science
[4] University of Kentucky Medical Center,Sanders
[5] University of Kentucky Medical Center,Brown Center on Aging
来源
Neuropsychology Review | 2002年 / 12卷
关键词
nonepileptic seizures; epilepsy; differential diagnosis; neuropsychology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) is complex. Long-term electroencephalogram monitoring with video recording (video EEG) is the most common method of differential diagnosis of epilepsy and PNES. However, video EEG is complex, costly, and unavailable in some areas. Thus, alternative diagnostic techniques have been studied in the search for a diagnostic method that is as accurate as video EEG, but more cost effective, convenient, and readily available. This paper reviews the literature regarding possible diagnostic alternatives and organizes findings into 7 areas of study: demographic and medical history variables, seizure semiology, provocative testing, prolactin levels, single photon emission computed tomography, psychological testing, and neuropsychological testing. For each area, the literature is summarized, and conclusions about the accuracy of the technique as a diagnostic tool are drawn. Overall, it appears unlikely that any of the reviewed alternative techniques will replace video EEG monitoring; rather they may be more successful as complementary diagnostic tools. An important focus for further investigations involves combinations of diagnostic techniques for the differential diagnosis of epilepsy and PNES.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 64
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review of diagnostic techniques in the differential diagnosis of epileptic and nonepileptic seizures
    Cragar, DE
    Berry, DTR
    Fakhoury, TA
    Cibula, JE
    Schmitt, FA
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2002, 12 (01) : 31 - 64
  • [2] The semantics of epileptic and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and their differential diagnosis
    Beghi, Massimiliano
    Cornaggia, Isotta
    Diotti, Silvia
    Erba, Giuseppe
    Harder, Gaia
    Magaudda, Adriana
    Lagana, Angelina
    Vitale, Chiara
    Cornaggia, Cesare Maria
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2020, 111
  • [3] Differential diagnosis between epileptic seizures and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures based on semiology
    Xiaohui Xiang
    Jiajia Fang
    Yi Guo
    Acta Epileptologica, 1
  • [4] Differential diagnosis between epileptic seizures and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures based on semiology
    Xiang, Xiaohui
    Fang, Jiajia
    Guo, Yi
    ACTA EPILEPTOLOGICA, 2019, 1 (01):
  • [5] Use of the Personality Assessment Inventory as a tool in the differential diagnosis of epileptic versus nonepileptic seizures
    Mickley, N. C.
    Wagner, M. T.
    Pritchard, I. I. I. P. B.
    Topping, K. B.
    Halford, J. J.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 22 (07) : 810 - 810
  • [6] Diagnostic procedures in the differential diagnosis of epileptic versus pseudoepileptic seizures
    Alving, J.
    EPILEPSIA, 2006, 47 : 245 - 246
  • [7] Exploring the diagnostic utility of the CVLT for discrimination of epileptic and nonepileptic seizures
    Dearth, C
    Cragar, DE
    Berry, DTR
    Fakhoury, TA
    Schmitt, FA
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 16 (08) : 717 - 718
  • [8] Diagnostic and treatment practices for psychogenic nonepileptic and epileptic seizures in Namibia
    du Toit, Anina
    Pretorius, Chrisma
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2018, 83 : 92 - 102
  • [9] Differential diagnosis of epileptic seizures
    Remi, J.
    Noachtar, S.
    NERVENARZT, 2012, 83 (02): : 162 - +
  • [10] Epileptic seizures progressing into nonepileptic conversion seizures
    Devinsky, O
    Gordon, E
    NEUROLOGY, 1998, 51 (05) : 1293 - 1296