Comparison of the light scattering methods using the spherical basis

被引:0
|
作者
V. G. Farafonov
A. A. Vinokurov
V. B. Il’in
机构
[1] State University of Aerospace Instrumentation,
[2] St. Petersburg State University,undefined
来源
Optics and Spectroscopy | 2007年 / 102卷
关键词
42.25.Fx;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A comparative analysis of the widely known methods for solving the problem of light scattering by nonspherical particles—of the method of separation of variables (MSV), of the extended boundary condition method (EBCM), and the point-matching method (PMM), which use the spherical wave functions as a basis for the expansions of the fields—is carried out. In the scientific literature, these methods have been analyzed independently of one another in spite of their evident similarity: The same expansion coefficients are determined from similar set of equations and all optical characteristics are calculated with the same formulas. The ranges of applicability of the methods for dielectric spheroids and Chebyshev particles are studied in the same manner. It was found that, when considering the far-field zone, theoretical conditions of mathematical correctness of the EBCM and the MSV, apparently, differ fundamentally, although, as was shown, the methods themselves are extremely closely related. The performed numerical calculations suggest that the EBCM is preferable for spheroids, the MSV is preferable for Chebyshev particles, and the PMM, which is the most time-consuming method, gives satisfactory results in many cases when two other methods are inapplicable. Since the methods supplement one another well and their programs differ only in several tens of operators, we propose combining these methods within the framework of one universal program.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 938
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the light scattering methods using the spherical basis
    Farafonov, V. G.
    Vinokurov, A. A.
    Il'in, V. B.
    OPTICS AND SPECTROSCOPY, 2007, 102 (06) : 927 - 938
  • [2] COMPARISON OF THE FUNCTIONS OF LIGHT SCATTERING BY SPHERICAL PARTICLES
    MALYSHEV, YV
    OPTIKA I SPEKTROSKOPIYA, 1960, 8 (05): : 686 - 691
  • [3] Light scattering by small axisymmetric particles using a generalized method of separation of variables with a spherical basis
    Farafonov, V. G.
    Barkanov, S. V.
    Il'in, V. B.
    Vinokurov, A. A.
    JOURNAL OF OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 78 (08) : 544 - 550
  • [4] Near- and far-field light scattering by nonspherical particles: Applicability of methods that involve a spherical basis
    Farafonov, V. G.
    Il'in, V. B.
    Vinokurov, A. A.
    OPTICS AND SPECTROSCOPY, 2010, 109 (03) : 432 - 443
  • [5] Near- and far-field light scattering by nonspherical particles: Applicability of methods that involve a spherical basis
    V. G. Farafonov
    V. B. Il’in
    A. A. Vinokurov
    Optics and Spectroscopy, 2010, 109 : 432 - 443
  • [6] A comparison between rigorous light scattering methods
    Davidson, M
    Kleemann, BH
    Bischoff, J
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY X, 1997, 3051 : 606 - 619
  • [7] Light scattering by single erythrocyte: Comparison of different methods
    Wriedt, T
    Hellmers, J
    Eremina, E
    Schuh, R
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2006, 100 (1-3): : 444 - 456
  • [8] LIGHT SCATTERING BY SPHERICAL PARTICLES
    SINCLAIR, D
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1947, 37 (06) : 475 - 480
  • [9] Escherichia coli viability determination using dynamic light scattering: a comparison with standard methods
    Achim M. Loske
    Elba M. Tello
    Susana Vargas
    Rogelio Rodriguez
    Archives of Microbiology, 2014, 196 : 557 - 563
  • [10] Comparison of methods to quantify posterior capsule opacification using forward and backward light scattering
    Hirnschall, Nino
    Crnej, Alja
    Gangwani, Vinod
    Findl, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 40 (05): : 728 - 735