Selection of Adaptive Designs in Studies of Bioequivalence. Decision Criteria

被引:0
|
作者
N. N. Eremenko
D. V. Goryachev
机构
[1] Russian Ministry of Health,Scientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products
[2] Russian Ministry of Health (Sechenov University),I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
关键词
adaptive design; two-stage design; bioequivalence; coefficient of within-individual variability; CV;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Adaptive designs can be selected for bioequivalence studies of drugs for which there are no data on the variability of pharmacokinetic parameters (the within-individual variability coefficient, CVintra). These are designs with prospective plans for modification of volunteer sample size based on analysis of the results obtained within the study. The aim of the present work was to analyze the guidelines and protocols for bioequivalence studies with adaptive designs for the validity of selecting such a design for a number of parameters. The results of this retrospective study identified key points and generated a list of shortcomings. The need for a comprehensive literature search for CVintra values is noted - selection of an adaptive design is justified if no such a search is run and/or when there are conflicting data. Decision criteria for the selection of adaptive designs in bioequivalence studies are presented. Examples given will unify the approach and avoid mistakes in planning further bioequivalence studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1080 / 1088
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selection of Adaptive Designs in Studies of Bioequivalence. Decision Criteria
    Eremenko, N. N.
    Goryachev, D. V.
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY JOURNAL, 2023, 57 (07) : 1080 - 1088
  • [2] Optimal adaptive sequential designs for crossover bioequivalence studies
    Xu, Jialin
    Audet, Charles
    DiLiberti, Charles E.
    Hauck, Walter W.
    Montague, Timothy H.
    Parr, Alan F.
    Potvin, Diane
    Schuirmann, Donald J.
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2016, 15 (01) : 15 - 27
  • [3] Case studies, practical issues, and observations on population and individual bioequivalence.
    Zariffa, NMD
    Patterson, SD
    Boyle, D
    Hyneck, M
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 65 (02) : 174 - 174
  • [4] Two-Stage Adaptive Designs for Three-Treatment Bioequivalence Studies
    Grayling, Michael J.
    Mander, Adrian P.
    Wason, James M. S.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 11 (04): : 360 - 374
  • [5] Optimal Selection of Conductors in Distribution System Designs Using Multi-Criteria Decision
    Ponce, Diego
    Aguila Tellez, Alexander
    Krishnan, Narayanan
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (20)
  • [6] Adaptive designs for IVPT data with mixed scaled average bioequivalence
    Lim, Daeyoung
    Rantou, Elena
    Kim, Jessica
    Choi, Sungwoo
    Choi, Nam Hee
    Grosser, Stella
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2023, 22 (06) : 1116 - 1134
  • [7] COMPARISON OF REPLICATE AND SIMPLE CROSSOVER DESIGNS IN BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDIES
    Roman, M.
    Ochoa, D.
    Belmonte, C.
    Vilchez, S.
    Valdez, S. E.
    Abad-Santos, F.
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2016, 119 : 30 - 31
  • [8] REVIEW OF METHODS AND CRITERIA FOR THE EVALUATION OF BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDIES
    PABST, G
    JAEGER, H
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 38 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [9] Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs
    Potvin, Diane
    DiLiberti, Charles E.
    Hauck, Walter W.
    Parr, Alan F.
    Schuirman, Donald J.
    Smith, Robert A.
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2008, 7 (04) : 245 - 262
  • [10] REVIEW AND USE OF DECISION RULES FOR BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDIES
    NICOLAS, P
    TOD, M
    PETITJEAN, O
    [J]. THERAPIE, 1993, 48 (01): : 15 - 22