Responsible model deployment via model-agnostic uncertainty learning

被引:0
|
作者
Preethi Lahoti
Krishna Gummadi
Gerhard Weikum
机构
[1] Max Planck Institute for Informatics,
[2] Google Research,undefined
[3] Max Planck Institute for Software Systems,undefined
来源
Machine Learning | 2023年 / 112卷
关键词
Trustworthy ML; Uncertainty modeling; Failure analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Reliably predicting potential failure risks of machine learning (ML) systems when deployed with production data is a crucial aspect of trustworthy AI. This paper introduces the Risk Advisor, a novel post-hoc meta-learner for estimating failure risks and predictive uncertainties of any already-trained black-box classification model. In addition to providing a risk score, the Risk Advisor decomposes the uncertainty estimates into aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty components, thus giving informative insights into the sources of uncertainty inducing the failures. Consequently, Risk Advisor can distinguish between failures caused by data variability, data shifts and model limitations and provide useful guidance on appropriate risk mitigation actions (e.g., collecting more data to counter data shift). Extensive experiments on various families of black-box classification models and on real-world and synthetic datasets covering common ML failure scenarios show that the Risk Advisor reliably predicts deployment-time failure risks in all the scenarios, and outperforms strong baselines.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 970
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Responsible model deployment via model-agnostic uncertainty learning
    Lahoti, Preethi
    Gummadi, Krishna
    Weikum, Gerhard
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2023, 112 (03) : 939 - 970
  • [2] Model-Agnostic Federated Learning
    Mittone, Gianluca
    Riviera, Walter
    Colonnelli, Iacopo
    Birke, Robert
    Aldinucci, Marco
    [J]. EURO-PAR 2023: PARALLEL PROCESSING, 2023, 14100 : 383 - 396
  • [3] Model-Agnostic Private Learning
    Bassily, Raef
    Thakkar, Om
    Thakurta, Abhradeep
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 31 (NIPS 2018), 2018, 31
  • [4] Is Bayesian Model-Agnostic Meta Learning Better than Model-Agnostic Meta Learning, Provably?
    Chen, Lisha
    Chen, Tianyi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 151, 2022, 151
  • [5] Meta weight learning via model-agnostic meta-learning
    Xu, Zhixiong
    Chen, Xiliang
    Tang, Wei
    Lai, Jun
    Cao, Lei
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2021, 432 : 124 - 132
  • [6] Detecting and Mitigating Test-time Failure Risks via Model-agnostic Uncertainty Learning
    Lahoti, Preethi
    Gummadi, Krishna P.
    Weikum, Gerhard
    [J]. 2021 21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM 2021), 2021, : 1174 - 1179
  • [7] Uncertainty in Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning using Variational Inference
    Nguyen, Cuong
    Do, Thanh-Toan
    Carneiro, Gustavo
    [J]. 2020 IEEE WINTER CONFERENCE ON APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTER VISION (WACV), 2020, : 3079 - 3089
  • [8] Domain Generalization via Model-Agnostic Learning of Semantic Features
    Dou, Qi
    Castro, Daniel C.
    Kamnitsas, Konstantinos
    Glocker, Ben
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 32 (NIPS 2019), 2019, 32
  • [9] Learning Symbolic Model-Agnostic Loss Functions via Meta-Learning
    Raymond, Christian
    Chen, Qi
    Xue, Bing
    Zhang, Mengjie
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 45 (11) : 13699 - 13714
  • [10] Probabilistic Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning
    Finn, Chelsea
    Xu, Kelvin
    Levine, Sergey
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 31 (NIPS 2018), 2018, 31