Surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for cystic renal cell carcinoma

To compare the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) between patients with cystic renal cell carcinoma (cRCC) and those with solid RCC (sRCC). We retrospectively analyzed 1065 patients who underwent RAPN between 2013 and 2020 for a pathological diagnosis of RCC. Patients were divided into two groups: cRCC and sRCC. cRCC was diagnosed according to the Bosniak classification system. To minimize selection bias between the two groups, patient variables (patient characteristics) and tumor factors (such as size and complexity) were adjusted using 1:1 propensity score matching. Of the 1065 patients, 94 (9%) were diagnosed with cRCC. Bosniak categories of IIF, III, and IV were noted in 4 (4.2%), 31 (33%), and 59 (63%) patients, respectively. After matching, 83 patients each were assigned to the cRCC and sRCC groups. The operation time in cRCC tended to be longer than in sRCC but not significantly different (164 vs. 150 min, P = 0.0767). Other surgical outcomes, such as change in estimated glomerular filtration rate ( – 5.2 vs.  – 7.2%, P = 0.1577), perioperative complications (14.5 vs. 15.7%, P = 0.9225), estimated blood loss (62 vs. 58 mL, P = 0.5613), or negative surgical margin status (100 vs 99%, P = 0.236), were not significantly different between the two groups. During the follow-up period of about 2 years, one and two patients showed recurrence in the cRCC and sRCC groups, respectively. The surgical outcomes of RAPN were similar between cRCC and sRCC, demonstrating the feasibility of RAPN for cRCC.