A reply to Leigland’s “is a new version of philosophical pragmatism necessary? A reply to Barnes-Holmes”

被引：0

作者：

Dermot Barnes-Holmes

机构：

[1] National University of Ireland,Department of Psychology

[2] Maynooth,undefined

来源：

The Behavior Analyst | 2004年 / 27卷

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

页码：113 / 116

页数：3

共 50 条

[1] A reply to Leigland's - "Is a new version of philosophical pragmatism necessary? A reply to Barnes-Holmes"
Barnes-Holmes, D
[J]. BEHAVIOR ANALYST, 2004, 27 (01): : 113 - 116
[2] Is a new version of philosophical pragmatism necessary? A reply to Barnes-Holmes
Leigland, S
[J]. BEHAVIOR ANALYST, 2003, 26 (02): : 297 - 304
[3] In responseIs a new version of philosophical pragmatism necessary? A reply to Barnes-Holmes
Sam Leigland
[J]. The Behavior Analyst, 2003, 26 : 297 - 304
[4] Stepping down to the foundations is needed to remedy conceptual confusion:: A final reply to O'hora and Barnes-Holmes
Ribes-Iñesta, E
[J]. BEHAVIOR AND PHILOSOPHY, 2001, 29 (01) : 61 - 62
[5] On the limits of radical behaviorism: A reply to Leigland's reply
Lacey, H
[J]. BEHAVIOR AND PHILOSOPHY, 1998, 26 (1-2): : 63 - 71
[6] Post-skinnerian, post-skinner, or neo-skinnerian? Hayes, Barnes-Holmes, and Roche's
Ingvarsson, ET
Morris, EK
[J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2004, 54 (04): : 497 - 504
[7] Technical terms, intervening variables, and the limits of the concept of motivation: A response to whelan and Barnes-Holmes's (2013) commentary
Aló R.M.
Cançado C.R.X.
[J]. The Psychological Record, 2013, 63 (3) : 661 - 666
[8] Richard Posner's "Everyday Pragmatism" A Reply
Mathis, Klaus
[J]. ARCHIV FUR RECHTS- UND SOZIALPHILOSOPHIE, 2009, 95 (03): : 413 - 416
[9] 'England, England' (Reply to Tom Shippey's review of Julian Barnes's new novel)
Roberts, R
[J]. TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, 1998, (4981): : 19 - 19
[10] Reply to Holmes's review of The social construction of anorexia nervosa
Hepworth, J
[J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2003, 39 (02): : 194 - 195

← 1 2 3 4 5 →