Reframing incentives for climate policy action

被引:0
|
作者
J.-F. Mercure
P. Salas
P. Vercoulen
G. Semieniuk
A. Lam
H. Pollitt
P. B. Holden
N. Vakilifard
U. Chewpreecha
N. R. Edwards
J. E. Vinuales
机构
[1] University of Exeter,Global Systems Institute, Department of Geography
[2] University of Cambridge,Cambridge Centre for Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Governance (C
[3] Cambridge Econometrics, EENRG)
[4] University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL),Political Economy Research Institute and Department of Economics
[5] University of Massachusetts Amherst,Department of Economics
[6] SOAS University of London,Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences
[7] University of Macao,School of Environment, Earth & Ecosystem Sciences
[8] The Open University,undefined
来源
Nature Energy | 2021年 / 6卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A key aim of climate policy is to progressively substitute renewables and energy efficiency for fossil fuel use. The associated rapid depreciation and replacement of fossil-fuel-related physical and natural capital entail a profound reorganization of industry value chains, international trade and geopolitics. Here we present evidence confirming that the transformation of energy systems is well under way, and we explore the economic and strategic implications of the emerging energy geography. We show specifically that, given the economic implications of the ongoing energy transformation, the framing of climate policy as economically detrimental to those pursuing it is a poor description of strategic incentives. Instead, a new climate policy incentives configuration emerges in which fossil fuel importers are better off decarbonizing, competitive fossil fuel exporters are better off flooding markets and uncompetitive fossil fuel producers—rather than benefitting from ‘free-riding’—suffer from their exposure to stranded assets and lack of investment in decarbonization technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1143
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reframing incentives for climate policy action
    Mercure, J-F
    Salas, P.
    Vercoulen, P.
    Semieniuk, G.
    Lam, A.
    Pollitt, H.
    Holden, P. B.
    Vakilifard, N.
    Chewpreecha, U.
    Edwards, N. R.
    Vinuales, J. E.
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2021, 6 (12) : 1133 - +
  • [2] Climate, Inequality, and the Need for Reframing Climate Policy
    Schor, Juliet
    [J]. REVIEW OF RADICAL POLITICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 47 (04) : 525 - 536
  • [3] Meeting the climate challenge in the near term: Policy incentives for early action
    Petsonk, A
    Goffman, J
    [J]. FLEXIBLE MECHANISMS FOR AN EFFICIENT CLIMATE POLICY: COST SAVING POLICIES AND BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES, 2000, 11 : 111 - 125
  • [4] Reframing climate security: The "planetary" as policy context
    Dalby, Simon
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2024, 155
  • [5] Selfish Incentives for Climate Policy: Empower the Young!
    Karp, Larry
    Peri, Alesandro
    Rezai, Armon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2024, 11 (05) : 1165 - 1200
  • [6] Water policy in Minnesota: issues, incentives, and action
    Hamstead, Mark
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 20 (04) : 364 - 365
  • [7] Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy
    Bernauer, Thomas
    McGrath, Liam F.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 6 (07) : 680 - 683
  • [8] Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy
    Bernauer T.
    McGrath L.F.
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6 (7) : 680 - 683
  • [9] Cost containment in climate policy and incentives for technology development
    Nemet, Gregory F.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2010, 103 (3-4) : 423 - 443
  • [10] Cost containment in climate policy and incentives for technology development
    Gregory F. Nemet
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2010, 103 : 423 - 443