Simulation of the Hurricane Dennis storm surge and considerations for vertical resolution

被引:0
|
作者
Dmitry S. Dukhovskoy
Steven L. Morey
机构
[1] Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies,Florida State University
来源
Natural Hazards | 2011年 / 58卷
关键词
Storm surge modeling; Unstructured grid; Vertical discretization; Coastal inundation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A high-resolution storm surge model of Apalachee Bay in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico is developed using an unstructured grid finite-volume coastal ocean model (FVCOM). The model is applied to the case of Hurricane Dennis (July 2005). This storm caused underpredicted severe flooding of the Apalachee Bay coastal area and upriver inland communities. Accurate resolution of complicated geometry of the coastal region and waterways in the model reveals processes responsible for the unanticipated high storm tide in the area. Model results are validated with available observations of the storm tide. Model experiments suggest that during Dennis, excessive flooding in the coastal zone and the town of St. Marks, located up the St. Marks River, was caused by additive effects of coincident high tides (~10–15% of the total sea-level rise) and a propagating shelf wave (~30%) that added to the locally wind-generated surge. Wave setup, the biggest uncertainty, is estimated on the basis of empirical and analytical relations. The Dennis case is then used to test the sensitivity of the model solution to vertical discretization. A suite of model experiments is performed with varying numbers of vertical sigma (σ) levels, with different distribution of σ-levels within the water column and a varying bottom drag coefficient. The major finding is that the storm surge solution is more sensitive to resolution within the velocity shear zone at mid-depths compared to resolution of the upper and bottom layer or values of the bottom drag coefficient.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:511 / 540
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simulation of the Hurricane Dennis storm surge and considerations for vertical resolution
    Dukhovskoy, Dmitry S.
    Morey, Steven L.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2011, 58 (01) : 511 - 540
  • [2] On the sensitivity of hurricane storm surge simulation to domain size
    Li, Rui
    Xie, Lian
    Liu, Bin
    Guan, Changlong
    OCEAN MODELLING, 2013, 67 : 1 - 12
  • [3] An adaptive discontinuous Galerkin method for the simulation of hurricane storm surge
    Nicole Beisiegel
    Stefan Vater
    Jörn Behrens
    Frédéric Dias
    Ocean Dynamics, 2020, 70 : 641 - 666
  • [4] An adaptive discontinuous Galerkin method for the simulation of hurricane storm surge
    Beisiegel, Nicole
    Vater, Stefan
    Behrens, Joern
    Dias, Frederic
    OCEAN DYNAMICS, 2020, 70 (05) : 641 - 666
  • [5] Role of Hurricane Wind Models in Accurate Simulation of Storm Surge and Waves
    Torres, Marissa J.
    Hashemi, M. Reza
    Hayward, Scott
    Spaulding, Malcolm
    Ginis, Isaac
    Grilli, Stephan T.
    JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2019, 145 (01)
  • [6] HURRICANE STORM-SURGE FORECASTING
    SHAFFER, WA
    11TH CONFERENCE ON PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 1989, : J53 - J58
  • [7] The influence of storm size on hurricane surge
    Irish, Jennifer L.
    Resio, Donald T.
    Ratcliff, Jay J.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 2008, 38 (09) : 2003 - 2013
  • [8] Hurricane Katrina storm surge reconnaissance
    Fritz, Hermann M.
    Blount, Chris
    Sokoloski, Robert
    Singleton, Justin
    Fuggle, Andrew
    McAdoo, Brian G.
    Moore, Andrew
    Grass, Chad
    Tate, Banks
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (05) : 644 - 656
  • [9] Future projections of storm surge in Hurricane Katrina and sensitivity to meteorological forcing resolution
    Danso, Derrick K.
    Patricola, Christina M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 6 (09):
  • [10] Hurricane Katrina storm surge delineation: implications for future storm surge forecasts and warnings
    Ginni Melton
    Melanie Gall
    Jerry T. Mitchell
    Susan L. Cutter
    Natural Hazards, 2010, 54 : 519 - 536