People Do not Automatically Take the Level-1 Visual Perspective of Humanoid Robot Avatars

被引:0
|
作者
Chengli Xiao
Ya Fan
Jingyu Zhang
Renlai Zhou
机构
[1] Nanjing University,Department of Psychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences
关键词
Visual perspective‐taking; Human–robot interaction; Anthropomorphism; Individual differences;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Taking the perspective of others is critical for both human–human and human–robot interactions. Previous studies using the dot perspective task have revealed that people could automatically process what other people can see. In this study, following the classical dot perspective task, we showed that Chinese participants could not automatically process humanoid robot avatars’ perspective when only judging from self-perspective (Experiment 1) or randomly judging between self and avatar’s perspectives (Experiment 2), and people’s anthropomorphism tendency was related to the efficiency but not the automaticity of perspective-taking. These results revealed that human–human and human–robot interactions might be different in the basic visual process, and suggested the anthropomorphism tendency in people as an influential factor in human–robot interaction.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 176
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] People Do not Automatically Take the Level-1 Visual Perspective of Humanoid Robot Avatars
    Xiao, Chengli
    Fan, Ya
    Zhang, Jingyu
    Zhou, Renlai
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2022, 14 (01) : 165 - 176
  • [2] Try to See it My Way: Humans Take the Level-1 Visual Perspective of Humanoid Robot Avatars
    Wahn, Basil
    Berio, Leda
    Weiss, Matthias
    Newen, Albert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2023,
  • [3] The spontaneity of Level-1 visual perspective taking: Under the condition of multiple avatars
    Dou, Yan
    Li, Jing
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 56 (04) : 421 - 434
  • [4] Do People Spontaneously Take a Robot's Visual Perspective?
    Zhao, Xuan
    Cusimano, Corey
    Malle, Bertram F.
    [J]. ELEVENTH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'16), 2016, : 335 - 342
  • [5] Can emotions influence level-1 visual perspective taking?
    Bukowski, Henryk
    Samson, Dana
    [J]. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 7 (1-4) : 182 - 191
  • [6] Dissociating processes underlying level-1 visual perspective taking in adults
    Todd, Andrew R.
    Cameron, C. Daryl
    Simpson, Austin J.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2017, 159 : 97 - 101
  • [7] The Goal-Dependence of Level-1 and Level-2 Visual Perspective Calculation
    Todd, Andrew R.
    Cameron, C. Daryl
    Simpson, Austin J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2021, 47 (06) : 948 - 967
  • [8] Executive function underlies both perspective selection and calculation in Level-1 visual perspective taking
    Adam W. Qureshi
    Rebecca L. Monk
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2018, 25 : 1526 - 1534
  • [9] Executive function underlies both perspective selection and calculation in Level-1 visual perspective taking
    Qureshi, Adam W.
    Monk, Rebecca L.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (04) : 1526 - 1534
  • [10] Anxiety impairs spontaneous perspective calculation: Evidence from a level-1 visual perspective-taking task
    Todd, Andrew R.
    Simpson, Austin J.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2016, 156 : 88 - 94