Measurement uncertainty: requirements set in the accreditation standards

被引:0
|
作者
Kyriacos C. Tsimillis
机构
[1] Pancyprian Union of Chemists,Division of Quality Assurance
来源
关键词
Measurement uncertainty; Accreditation; Proficiency testing; Reference material; Metrological traceability; Conformity assessment body;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Measurement uncertainty is of high importance to all testing and calibration laboratories and those involved in sampling activities. Its evaluation requires good understanding of the method implemented and realisation of all factors contributing to it. It is required that the users of the results fully understand the meaning of uncertainty stated on test reports and calibration certificates and, when needed, ask for clarifications. Laboratories, both the accredited ones and those being prepared towards their accreditation, need to take this into account when evaluating the uncertainty of their results. Competent authorities need to consider the stated uncertainty to compare the result with a legislative limit. The producer can decide on adjustments needed. The consumer may find it more difficult to understand how this “uncertain component” of the results could affect their health, safety or economic rights. This article describes the relevant requirements of the accreditation standards referring both to testing and calibration laboratories and to proficiency testing and reference material producers. Further to this, the article explains why all these factors have to be considered by a laboratory.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 114
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement uncertainty: requirements set in the accreditation standards
    Tsimillis, Kyriacos C.
    [J]. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2018, 23 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [2] Correction to: Measurement uncertainty: requirements set in the accreditation standards
    Kyriacos C. Tsimillis
    [J]. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2018, 23 : 253 - 253
  • [3] Measurement uncertainty: requirements set in the accreditation standards (vol 23, pg 109, 2018)
    Tsimillis, Kyriacos C.
    [J]. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2018, 23 (04) : 253 - 253
  • [4] Data integrity: requirements set in the accreditation standards
    Tsimillis, Kyriacos C.
    [J]. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2019, 24 (03) : 165 - 171
  • [5] Data integrity: requirements set in the accreditation standards
    Kyriacos C. Tsimillis
    [J]. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2019, 24 : 165 - 171
  • [6] Immunization requirements in medical school accreditation standards
    Gaviola, G. C.
    Desai, S.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2024, 42 (04) : 753 - 756
  • [7] DUST STANDARDS INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS
    KOBRICK, TE
    [J]. MINING CONGRESS JOURNAL, 1970, 56 (10): : 33 - &
  • [8] QUANTIFYING MODEL UNCERTAINTY USING MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY STANDARDS
    Du, Xiaoping
    Shah, Harsheel
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2011, VOL 5, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 1161 - 1167
  • [9] Coordinate measurement uncertainty: Models and standards
    Plowucha, Wojciech
    Jakubiec, Wladyslaw
    [J]. TM-TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2015, 82 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [10] Uncertainty calculations in a measurement standards laboratory
    Husain, R.
    An-Nahdi, K.A.
    [J]. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China, Part A: Physical Science and Engineering, 2000, 24 (03): : 210 - 215