Comparison of debris-flow volumes from burned and unburned areas

被引:0
|
作者
Paul M. Santi
Luca Morandi
机构
[1] Colorado School of Mines,Department of Geology and Geological Engineering
来源
Landslides | 2013年 / 10卷
关键词
Debris flow; Magnitude; Yield rate; Wildfire; Recovery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The goals of this work are to show the range of debris-flow volumes and watershed characteristics for several locations, and the differences in flow volumes for events triggered soon after wildfire. A dataset of 929 events was divided into groups based on location and burn status. The three unburned locations show significant differences: debris flows from the Italian Alps are larger and generate more debris per unit basin area or unit channel length than flows in the Western USA or in the Pacific Northwest. However, some of the observed differences may be attributed to the skew of the Italian Alps dataset towards larger events, and the small size and limited range of the Pacific Northwest data. For burned watersheds in the Western U.S. events, there is a clear progression in decreasing volume in debris flows as basins recover from the wildfire: it takes approximately 1 year, or at a few locations, as much as 3 years, for debris production to return to pre-fire rates. The difference is most apparent when the data are normalized for basin area (the area yield, which is 2× larger for burned basins) or for channel length (the length yield, which is 1.6× larger for burned basins). When normalized simultaneously for basin area, channel length, and channel gradient, burned areas produce significantly more debris (2.7–5.4 times as much). Burned areas in the Western USA are more sensitive to wildfire and produce larger debris flows than burned areas in more humid climates such as the Pacific Northwest.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 769
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of debris-flow volumes from burned and unburned areas
    Santi, Paul
    Morandi, Luca
    [J]. LANDSLIDES, 2013, 10 (06) : 757 - 769
  • [2] Debris-flow generation from recently burned watersheds
    Cannon, SH
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING GEOSCIENCE, 2001, 7 (04): : 321 - 341
  • [3] Estimation of debris-flow volumes from storm events
    Bianco, G
    Franzi, L
    [J]. DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, : 441 - 448
  • [4] Controls on debris-flow initiation on burned and unburned hillslopes during an exceptional rainstorm in southern New Mexico, USA
    Tillery, Anne C.
    Rengers, Francis K.
    [J]. EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2020, 45 (04) : 1051 - 1066
  • [5] Extreme Precipitation Across Adjacent Burned and Unburned Watersheds Reveals Impacts of Low Severity Wildfire on Debris-Flow Processes
    McGuire, Luke A.
    Youberg, Ann M.
    Rengers, Francis K.
    Abramson, Nathan S.
    Ganesh, Indujaa
    Gorr, Alexander N.
    Hoch, Olivia
    Johnson, Justin C.
    Lamom, Patt
    Prescott, Alexander B.
    Zanetell, Jessica
    Fenerty, Brendan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 2021, 126 (04)
  • [6] Characterization of acceptable risk for debris flows in China: Comparison in debris-flow prone areas and nonprone areas
    Miao, Cheng
    Liu, Xilin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 42
  • [7] COMPARISON OF INSECTS FROM BURNED AND UNBURNED AREAS AFTER A RANGE FIRE
    HANSEN, JD
    [J]. GREAT BASIN NATURALIST, 1986, 46 (04): : 721 - 727
  • [8] Debris-flow response of southern California watersheds burned by wildfire
    Cannon, SH
    [J]. DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, : 45 - 52
  • [9] Geomorphological estimation of debris-flow volumes in alpine basins
    D'Agostino, V
    Marchi, L
    [J]. DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 1097 - 1106
  • [10] Sources of debris flow material in burned areas
    Santi, Paul M.
    deWolfe, Victor G.
    Higgins, Jerry D.
    Cannon, Susan H.
    Gartner, Joseph E.
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2008, 96 (3-4) : 310 - 321