Item-level analyses reveal genetic heterogeneity in neuroticism

被引:0
|
作者
Mats Nagel
Kyoko Watanabe
Sven Stringer
Danielle Posthuma
Sophie van der Sluis
机构
[1] Section Complex Trait Genetics,Department of Clinical Genetics
[2] Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research,Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience
[3] Amsterdam Neuroscience,undefined
[4] VU Medical Centre,undefined
[5] VU University Amsterdam,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of psychological traits are generally conducted on (dichotomized) sums of items or symptoms (e.g., case-control status), and not on the individual items or symptoms themselves. We conduct large-scale GWAS on 12 neuroticism items and observe notable and replicable variation in genetic signal between items. Within samples, genetic correlations among the items range between 0.38 and 0.91 (mean rg = .63), indicating genetic heterogeneity in the full item set. Meta-analyzing the two samples, we identify 255 genome-wide significant independent genomic regions, of which 138 are item-specific. Genetic analyses and genetic correlations with 33 external traits support genetic differences between the items. Hierarchical clustering analysis identifies two genetically homogeneous item clusters denoted depressed affect and worry. We conclude that the items used to measure neuroticism are genetically heterogeneous, and that biological understanding can be gained by studying them in genetically more homogeneous clusters.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Item-level analyses reveal genetic heterogeneity in neuroticism
    Nagel, Mats
    Watanabe, Kyoko
    Stringer, Sven
    Posthuma, Danielle
    van der Sluis, Sophie
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 9
  • [2] ITEM-LEVEL STUDY OF NEUROTICISM REVEALS GENETIC HETEROGENEITY
    Nagel, Mats
    Watanabe, Kyoko
    Stringer, Sven
    van der Sluis, Sophie
    Posthuma, Danielle
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 29 : 1102 - 1102
  • [3] Accommodations and Item-Level Analyses Using Mixture Differential Item Functioning Models
    Scarpati, Stanley E.
    Wells, Craig S.
    Lewis, Christine
    Jirka, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2011, 45 (01): : 54 - 62
  • [4] Scale-and Item-Level Factor Analyses of the VIA Inventory of Strengths
    McGrath, Robert E.
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2014, 21 (01) : 4 - 14
  • [5] The utility of item-level analyses in model evaluation: A reply to Seidenberg and Plaut
    Balota, DA
    Spieler, DH
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (03) : 238 - 240
  • [6] ARE INTERNALIZING DISORDERS GENETICALLY DISTINCT? LESSONS LEARNED FROM ITEM-LEVEL ANALYSES
    Savage, Jeanne
    Nagel, Mats
    Watanabe, Kyoko
    Posthuma, Danielle
    van der Sluis, Sophie
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 29 : 1217 - 1218
  • [7] Modeling item-level data with item response theory
    Zickar, MJ
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 7 (04) : 104 - 109
  • [8] Factor- and item-level analyses of the 38-item Activities Scale for Kids-performance
    Bagley, Anita M.
    Gorton, George E.
    Bjornson, Kristie
    Bevans, Katherine
    Stout, Jean L.
    Narayanan, Unni
    Tucker, Carole A.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2011, 53 (02): : 161 - 166
  • [9] RFID and item-level information visibility
    Zhou, Wei
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 198 (01) : 252 - 258
  • [10] Item-Level Time Limits Are Not a Panacea
    Schmitz, Florian
    Wilhelm, Oliver
    [J]. MEASUREMENT-INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 13 (3-4) : 182 - 185