Advances in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Imaging Biomarkers

被引:0
|
作者
Shah R.N. [1 ,2 ]
Allen J.W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
[2] Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Suite BG20, Atlanta, 30322, GA
[3] Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
关键词
Concussion; Diffusion tensor imaging; Fractional anisotropy; Functional MRI; Mild traumatic brain injury; Susceptibility-weighted imaging;
D O I
10.1007/s40134-017-0210-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of Review: Imaging diagnosis and prognostication of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) remains elusive. The goal of this review is to highlight recent advancements in MR imaging biomarkers of mTBI. Recent Findings: Susceptibility-weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping are more sensitive for microhemorrhages than conventional T2* sequences and may allow semi-automated detection of these lesions. Alterations in fractional anisotropy in mTBI have been well described; however, recent data suggest a time-dependent directionality to these changes. Functional MRI studies have recently reported abnormal connectivity following mTBI. Recent advances in whole-brain MR spectroscopy have allowed the characterization of global changes in TBI. However, variability in acquisition and analysis has limited inferences and generalizability of results. Summary: While use of these techniques has advanced our understanding of mTBI, standardization in study design is needed. A large, multi-center, standardized study using these techniques could allow the translation of the methods from the research group level to the clinical individual level. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Imaging Biomarkers of Delayed Sequelae in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Reams, Nicole
    Anderson, Julie
    Perlman, Reid
    Li, Wei
    Walters, Shaun
    Wang, Chi
    Frigerio, Roberta
    Maraganore, Demetrius
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2017, 88
  • [2] Advances in Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers
    Nishimura, Kengo
    Cordeiro, Joacir G.
    Ahmed, Aminul I.
    Yokobori, Shoji
    Gajavelli, Shyam
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [3] MRI biomarkers in mild traumatic brain injury
    Haehnel, Stefan
    Herweh, Christian
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2015, 84 (06) : 554 - 555
  • [4] Comment: Biomarkers for mild traumatic brain injury
    Tonarelli, Silvina B.
    Quinn, Davin K.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2020, 94 (23) : 1017 - 1017
  • [5] NEUROTOXICITY BIOMARKERS ASSAYS FOR MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
    Dambinova, Svetlana A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2012, 29 (10) : A90 - A90
  • [6] The current state of biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury
    Kim, Han Jun
    Tsao, Jack W.
    Stanfill, Ansley Grimes
    [J]. JCI INSIGHT, 2018, 3 (01):
  • [7] Quantitative EEG Biomarkers for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    Lewine, Jeffrey D.
    Plis, Sergey
    Ulloa, Alvaro
    Williams, Christopher
    Spitz, Mark
    Foley, John
    Paulson, Kim
    Davis, John
    Bangera, Nitin
    Snyder, Travis
    Weaver, Lindell
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 36 (04) : 298 - 305
  • [8] Molecular and functional biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury
    LaRocca, Dania
    Neville, Christopher
    Brindle, Andrew
    Rieger, Brian
    Uhlig, Richard
    Middleton, Frank
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2017, 31 (6-7) : 899 - 899
  • [9] Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
    Bigler, Erin D.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 23 (03) : 169 - 209
  • [10] Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
    Erin D. Bigler
    [J]. Neuropsychology Review, 2013, 23 : 169 - 209