Should IACUCs Review Scientific Merit of Animal Research Projects?

被引：0
|
作者：
Michael D. Mann
Ernest D. Prentice
机构：
[1] Mann is Professor and Executive Chair,
[2] IACUC,undefined
[3] and Prentice is Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs,undefined
[4] Regulatory Compliance,undefined
[5] University of Nebraska Medical Center,undefined
[6] 987830 Nebraska Medical Center,undefined
[7] Omaha,undefined
[8] NE 68198-7830.,undefined
来源：
Lab Animal | 2004年 / 33卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Whether IACUCs should review animal research protocols for scientific merit is not addressed in the federal regulations, resulting in ongoing confusion on the subject. The authors examine this issue, discuss the pros and cons, suggest how IACUCs can go about reviewing protocols for scientific merit, and question what effect recent changes in regulations will have on this issue.
引用
收藏
页码：26 / 31
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Should IACUCs review scientific merit of animal research projects?
    Mann, MD
    Prentice, ED
    LAB ANIMAL, 2004, 33 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [2] The Role of IACUCs in Responsible Animal Research
    Mohan, S.
    Huneke, R.
    ILAR JOURNAL, 2019, 60 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [3] Understanding the selection processes of public research projects in agriculture: The role of scientific merit
    Materia, V. C.
    Pascucci, S.
    Kolympiris, C.
    FOOD POLICY, 2015, 56 : 87 - 99
  • [4] How should treatments be critiqued for scientific merit?
    Harris, SR
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1996, 76 (02): : 175 - 181
  • [5] Scientific Merit: Integrity in Research
    Parse, Rosemarie Rizzo
    NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2016, 29 (01) : 5 - 5
  • [6] Scientific merit and research ethics
    Pilkington, FB
    NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 15 (03) : 196 - 200
  • [7] The IACUC and scientific merit review
    Shepherd, MJ
    CONTEMPORARY TOPICS IN LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2003, 42 (04): : 148 - 149
  • [8] ANIMAL RESEARCH - A CALL FOR LEGISLATIVE REFORM REQUIRING ETHICAL MERIT REVIEW
    BRODY, M
    HARVARD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW, 1989, 13 (02) : 423 - 484
  • [9] When should women be recruited to intrapartum research projects? A retrospective review
    Phipps, Hala
    de Vries, Bradley
    Kuah, Sabrina
    Hyett, Jon A.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (11) : 1264 - 1270
  • [10] Benefits and drawbacks of including consumer reviewers in the scientific merit review of breast cancer research
    Andejeski, Y
    Breslau, ES
    Hart, E
    Lythcott, N
    Alexander, L
    Rich, I
    Bisceglio, I
    Smith, HS
    Visco, FM
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE, 2002, 11 (02): : 119 - 136
12345