Identifying hotspots of land use cover change under socioeconomic and climate change scenarios in Mexico

被引:0
|
作者
Alma Mendoza-Ponce
Rogelio O. Corona-Núñez
Leopoldo Galicia
Florian Kraxner
机构
[1] International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis,Departamento de Geografía Física, Instituto de Geografía
[2] Procesos y Sistemas de Información en Geomática,undefined
[3] S.A. de C.V.,undefined
[4] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,undefined
来源
Ambio | 2019年 / 48卷
关键词
Deforestation; Drivers; Ecosystems; Mexico; Scenarios;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study identifies the hotspots of land use cover change (LUCC) under two socioeconomic and climate change scenarios [business as usual (BAU) and a pessimistic scenario] at the national level for Mexico for three-time periods. Modelling suggests that by 2050 grassland and tropical evergreen forest will be the most endangered ecosystems, having lost 20–33% (BAU) or 43–46% (pessimistic scenario) of their extent in comparison to 1993. Agricultural expansion would be the major driver of LUCC, increasing from 24.4% of the country in 1993 to 30% (BAU) or 34% (pessimistic) in 2050. The most influential variables were distance from roads and human settlements, slope, aridity, and evapotranspiration. The hotspots of LUCC were influenced by environmental constraints and socioeconomic activities more than by climate change. These findings could be used to build proposals to reduce deforestation, including multiple feedbacks among urbanization, industrialization and food consumption.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 349
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying hotspots of land use cover change under socioeconomic and climate change scenarios in Mexico
    Mendoza-Ponce, Alma
    Corona-Nunez, Rogelio O.
    Galicia, Leopoldo
    Kraxner, Florian
    [J]. AMBIO, 2019, 48 (04) : 336 - 349
  • [2] Scenarios of land cover in Eurasia under climate change
    FAN Zemeng
    BAI Ruyu
    YUE Tianxiang
    [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30 (01) : 3 - 17
  • [3] Scenarios of land cover in Eurasia under climate change
    Zemeng Fan
    Ruyu Bai
    Tianxiang Yue
    [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30 : 3 - 17
  • [4] Scenarios of land cover in Eurasia under climate change
    Fan, Zemeng
    Bai, Ruyu
    Yue, Tianxiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 30 (01) : 3 - 17
  • [5] 1 km land use/land cover change of China under comprehensive socioeconomic and climate scenarios for 2020–2100
    Meng Luo
    Guohua Hu
    Guangzhao Chen
    Xiaojuan Liu
    Haiyan Hou
    Xia Li
    [J]. Scientific Data, 9
  • [6] 1 km land use/land cover change of China under comprehensive socioeconomic and climate scenarios for 2020-2100
    Luo, Meng
    Hu, Guohua
    Chen, Guangzhao
    Liu, Xiaojuan
    Hou, Haiyan
    Li, Xia
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2022, 9 (01)
  • [7] Species, taxonomic, and functional group diversities of terrestrial mammals at risk under climate change and land-use/cover change scenarios in Mexico
    Ureta, Carolina
    Ramirez-Barron, Mercedes
    Andres Sanchez-Garcia, Edgar
    Cuervo-Robayo, Angela P.
    Munguia-Carrara, Mariana
    Mendoza-Ponce, Alma
    Gay, Carlos
    Sanchez-Cordero, Victor
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (23) : 6992 - 7008
  • [8] The Impact of Land Use/Land Cover Change (LULCC) on Water Resources in a Tropical Catchment in Tanzania under Different Climate Change Scenarios
    Naeschen, Kristian
    Diekkruegre, Bernd
    Evrs, Mariele e
    Hoellermann, Britta
    Steinbach, Stefanie
    Thonfeld, Frank
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (24)
  • [9] Identifying effects of land use cover changes and climate change on terrestrial ecosystems and carbon stocks in Mexico
    Mendoza-Ponce, Alma
    Corona-Nunez, Rogelio
    Kraxner, Florian
    Leduc, Sylvain
    Patrizio, Piera
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2018, 53 : 12 - 23
  • [10] Surrogate species protection in Bolivia under climate and land cover change scenarios
    Osipova, Liudmila
    Sangermano, Florencia
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2016, 34 : 107 - 117