Effect of the board of directors and the audit committee on firm performance: a panel data analysis

被引:39
|
作者
Ben Barka H. [1 ,2 ]
Legendre F. [3 ]
机构
[1] ISCCB, Carthage University, Bizerte
[2] CEPN-CNRS UMR no 7234, University Paris 13, PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, 99 Avenue JB Clément, Villetaneuse
[3] Érudite, University Paris Est Créteil, Créteil
关键词
Audit committee; CEO power; External shareholders; Independent directors;
D O I
10.1007/s10997-016-9356-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This research examines the relationship between independent directors, the audit committee (AC), and firm performance, taking into account the impact of the chief executive officer’s powers and block shareholders. We use the maximum likelihood estimator, based on agency theory assumptions and cylindered panel data, to examine three models of firm performance. The results show that the independence of the board is reflected clearly by increased economic and equity performance of the firm. However, an AC that is fully independent or meets frequently is associated with lower firm performance. Unlike pension funds, institutional shareholders can be considered an effective control mechanism in the context of France. Our results development includes advanced explanations for market liquidity and shareholders’ portfolios. The study period ends before the European regulation on ACs came into effect in 2008. This allows for an appreciation of soft law in French corporate governance. It also lets us compare the data with the way firms operate their boards one decade later. The evidence provides useful guidelines on the supremacy of soft law in corporate governance and suggests that the composition and functioning of the board of directors should be moderated based on the firms’ context. The specificity of the cylindered panel data helps to better examine the impact of the board and AC’s independence and functioning in French corporate governance structure. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:737 / 755
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Interaction Effect of Nomination Committee's Effectiveness on Board of Directors' Characteristics and Firm Performance
    Al-Absy, Mujeeb Saif Mohsen
    AlMahari, Nada Hameed
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [2] Effect of profitability, audit committee, company size, activity, and board of directors on sustainability
    Kalbuana, Nawang
    Kusiyah, Kusiyah
    Supriatiningsih, Supriatiningsih
    Budiharjo, Roy
    Budyastuti, Triyani
    Rusdiyanto, Rusdiyanto
    [J]. COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [3] Impact of Board's Characteristics, Audit Committee Characteristics Over Firm Performance
    Nawafly, Ali Thamer
    Alarussi, Ali Saleh
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACCOUNTING STUDIES (ICAS) 2016, 2016, : 29 - 34
  • [4] The Effect of Board of Directors' IT Awareness on CIO Compensation and Firm Performance
    Yayla, Ali Alper
    Hu, Qing
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCES, 2014, 45 (03) : 401 - 436
  • [5] Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance
    Naciti, Valeria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 237
  • [6] The relationship of board of directors, audit committee and earnings management: Analysis of Russian public companies
    Nikulin, E. D.
    Sviridov, A. A.
    Smirnov, M. V.
    [J]. ROSSIISKII ZHURNAL MENEDZHMENTA-RUSSIAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 18 (02): : 189 - 216
  • [7] Firm performance and board committee structure
    Klein, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1998, 41 (01): : 275 - 303
  • [8] Outside directors on the board and innovative firm performance
    Balsmeier, Benjamin
    Buchwald, Achim
    Stiebale, Joel
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (10) : 1800 - 1815
  • [9] Female directors, board committees and firm performance
    Green, Colin P.
    Homroy, Swarnodeep
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 102 : 19 - 38
  • [10] Corporate Governance, Board of Directors, and Firm Performance
    Kumar, Praveen
    Zattoni, Alessandro
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2013, 21 (04) : 311 - 313