Assessment of axillary node status by ultrasound after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer according to breast cancer subtype

被引:0
|
作者
Yurina Maeshima
Takehiko Sakai
Akiko Ogiya
Yoko Takahashi
Yumi Miyagi
Yumi Kokubu
Tomo Osako
Yoshinori Ito
Shunji Takahashi
Shinji Ohno
Takayuki Ueno
机构
[1] Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research,Department of Surgical Oncology, Breast Oncology Center
[2] Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research,Department of Ultrasound
[3] Cancer Institute of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research,Division of Pathology
[4] Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research,Department of Breast Medical Oncology
[5] Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research,Medical Oncology
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The use of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with cN1 breast cancer is controversial. Improvements of negative predictive value (NPV) by axillary ultrasound (AUS), which corresponds to the accurate prediction rate of node-negative status after NAC, would lead to decreased FNR of SNB following NAC. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the accurate prediction rate of NPV by AUS after NAC in patients with cytologically node-positive breast cancer treated between January 2012 and December 2016. Of 279 eligible patients, the NPV was 49.2% in all patients, but varied significantly by tumor subtype (p < 0.001) and tumor response determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (p = 0.0003). Of the 23 patients with clinically node negative (ycN0) by AUS and clinical complete response in primary lesion by MRI, the NPV was 100% in patients with HR±/HER2+ or HR−/HER2− breast cancer. In conclusion, regarding FNR reduction post-NAC, it will be of clinical value to take tumor subtype and primary tumor response using MRI into account to identify patients for SNB after NAC.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of axillary node status by ultrasound after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer according to breast cancer subtype
    Maeshima, Yurina
    Sakai, Takehiko
    Ogiya, Akiko
    Takahashi, Yoko
    Miyagi, Yumi
    Kokubu, Yumi
    Osako, Tomo
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Takahashi, Shunji
    Ohno, Shinji
    Ueno, Takayuki
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [2] Predictors of axillary node response in clinically node-positive patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Ladak, Farah
    Lesniak, David
    Chua, Natalie
    Peiris, Lashan
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : 264 - 265
  • [3] Axillary Management Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer
    Mitri, Samir
    Roldan-Vasquez, Estefania
    Flores, Rene
    Pardo, Jaime
    Borgonovo, Giulia
    Davis, Roger B.
    James, Ted A.
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2024, 24 (06) : 527 - 532
  • [4] Nomograms for Predicting Axillary Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Patients with Breast Cancer
    Vila, Jose
    Mittendorf, Elizabeth A.
    Farante, Gabriel
    Bassett, Roland L.
    Veronesi, Paolo
    Galimberti, Viviana
    Peradze, Nicolas
    Stauder, Michael C.
    Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana
    Litton, Jennifer F.
    Huo, Lei
    Kuerer, Henry M.
    Hunt, Kelly K.
    Caudle, Abigail S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (11) : 3501 - 3509
  • [5] Nomograms for Predicting Axillary Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Patients with Breast Cancer
    Jose Vila
    Elizabeth A. Mittendorf
    Gabriel Farante
    Roland L. Bassett
    Paolo Veronesi
    Viviana Galimberti
    Nicolas Peradze
    Michael C. Stauder
    Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
    Jennifer F. Litton
    Lei Huo
    Henry M. Kuerer
    Kelly K. Hunt
    Abigail S. Caudle
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 3501 - 3509
  • [6] Targeted Axillary Dissection for Patients Who Convert to Clinically Node Negative After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer
    Kandice Ludwig
    Amanda L. Kong
    [J]. Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2020, 12 : 391 - 397
  • [7] Targeted Axillary Dissection for Patients Who Convert to Clinically Node Negative After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer
    Ludwig, Kandice
    Kong, Amanda L.
    [J]. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2020, 12 (04) : 391 - 397
  • [8] Axillary recurrence in clinically node-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery
    Dux, Joseph
    Jacobs, Lisa
    Habibi, Mehran
    Wright, Pamela
    Lange, Julie
    Camp, Melissa
    O'Donnell, Maureen
    Tran, Bonnie Sun Hanh-Tam
    Euhus, David
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (SUPPL 1) : 316 - 316
  • [9] Axillary lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer.
    Van Zeeland, M.
    Westhoff, P.
    Wauters, C.
    Bult, P.
    Werner, A.
    Laurens, N.
    Strobbe, L.
    Meijer, H.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S519 - S519
  • [10] Sentinel lymph node biopsy with/without axillary dissection in clinically node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Cabioglu, Neslihan
    Karanlik, Hasan
    Gulcelik, Mehmet Ali
    Ilgun, Serkan
    Igci, Abdullah
    Uras, Cihan
    Cakmak, Guldeniz Karadeniz
    Ugurlu, Umit
    Muslumanoglu, Mahmut
    Kocer, Havva Belma
    Trabulus, Didem Can
    Dag, Ahmet
    Tukenmez, Mustafa
    Sen Oran, Ebru
    Karaman, Niyazi
    Emiroglu, Selman
    Zengel, Baha
    Atahan, Kemal
    Senol, Kazim
    Ersoy, Yeliz
    Dilege, Ece
    Dogan, Lutfi
    Basaran, Gul
    Yildirim, Nilufer
    Kara, Halil
    Ozbas, Serdar
    Soyder, Aykut
    Polat, Ayfer Kamali
    Ozemir, Ibrahim Ali
    Yeniay, Levent
    Altinok, Ayse
    Dogan, Mutlu
    Ozkurt, Enver
    Velidedeoglu, Mehmet
    Ozcinar, Beyza
    Balci, Fatih Levent
    Sevinc, Ali Ibrahim
    Arici, Cumhur
    Ozmen, Vahit
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (SUPPL 1) : 69 - 70