Pharmacoeconomic Considerations in Treating Ovarian Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Diane Bodurka-Bevers
Charlotte C. Sun
David M. Gershenson
机构
[1] The University of Texas MD,Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology
来源
PharmacoEconomics | 2000年 / 17卷
关键词
Ovarian Cancer; Paclitaxel; Febrile Neutropenia; Epithelial Ovarian Cancer; Patient Preference;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death in women with gynaecological cancers. The most common type of ovarian cancer is epithelial ovarian cancer. Referred to as the ‘silent’ killer, this disease is difficult to detect because of the lack of specific symptoms. The majority of women who have ovarian cancer are diagnosed in the advanced stages. While the exact cause of ovarian cancer remains elusive, it is believed that the events relating to incessant ovulatory function play a major role in the development of this disease. Long term prognosis of women with ovarian cancer remains grim. Although ovarian cancer is highly responsive to chemotherapy, most women will develop persistent or recurrent disease after primary treatment. The standard front-line treatment is paclitaxel in combination with a platinum-based agent; however, toxicities associated with paclitaxel must be weighed against the clinical benefit. The economic issues associated with the treatment of ovarian cancer involve costs of chemotherapy agents andmanagement of supportive care. Patient preferences and quality-of-life issues are also of major importance because of the short survival benefit for most patients. Therefore, quality of lifemust bemaximised alongside efforts to prolong survival. More research is necessary to determine what trade-offs (e.g. adverse effects of treatment) patients are willing to make for modest gains in survival.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 150
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pharmacoeconomic considerations in treating ovarian cancer
    Bodurka-Bevers, D
    Sun, CC
    Gershenson, DM
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (02) : 133 - 150
  • [2] Pharmacoeconomic Considerations in Treating Actinic Keratosis
    Marjorie V. Neidecker
    Mary Lynn Davis-Ajami
    Rajesh Balkrishnan
    Steven R. Feldman
    PharmacoEconomics, 2009, 27 : 451 - 464
  • [3] Pharmacoeconomic Considerations in Treating Actinic Keratosis
    Neidecker, Marjorie V.
    Davis-Ajami, Mary Lynn
    Balkrishnan, Rajesh
    Feldman, Steven R.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2009, 27 (06) : 451 - 464
  • [4] Pharmacoeconomic Considerations in Treating Patients With Acute Leukaemia
    Viggo Jønsson
    Mogen Mørk Hansen
    Per Ljungman
    Stein Kaasa
    PharmacoEconomics, 1999, 15 : 167 - 178
  • [5] Pharmacoeconomic Considerations in Treating Actinic Keratosis: An Update
    Vale, Spencer M.
    Hill, Dane
    Feldman, Steven R.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2017, 35 (02) : 177 - 190
  • [6] Pharmacoeconomic considerations in treating patients with acute leukaemia
    Jonsson, V
    Hansen, MM
    Ljungman, P
    Kaasa, S
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1999, 15 (02) : 167 - 178
  • [7] Pharmacoeconomic Considerations in Treating Actinic Keratosis: An Update
    Spencer M. Vale
    Dane Hill
    Steven R. Feldman
    PharmacoEconomics, 2017, 35 : 177 - 190
  • [8] Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the treatment of breast cancer
    Pallis, Athanasios
    Tsiantou, Vasiliki
    Simou, Efi
    Maniadakis, Nikos
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2010, 2 : 47 - 61
  • [9] Pharmacoeconomic considerations of treating patients with advanced Parkinson's disease
    Reese, Jens P.
    Dams, Judith
    Winter, Yaroslav
    Balzer-Geldsetzer, Monika
    Oertel, Wolfgang H.
    Dodel, Richard
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2012, 13 (07) : 939 - 958
  • [10] PHARMACOECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT BREAKTHROUGH CANCER PAIN
    Vellucci, R.
    Mediati, R. D.
    Gasperoni, S.
    Piergallini, L. M.
    Valentino, M. C.
    Bruno, G. M.
    Di Matteo, S.
    Colombo, G. L.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A665 - A666