Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Watershed Prioritization Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Technique and GIS

被引:0
|
作者
V. M. Chowdary
D. Chakraborthy
A. Jeyaram
Y. V. N. Krishna Murthy
J. R. Sharma
V. K. Dadhwal
机构
[1] Regional Remote Sensing Centre,
[2] East-Kolkata,undefined
[3] NRSC,undefined
[4] Indian Institute of Remote Sensing,undefined
[5] National Remote Sensing Centre,undefined
来源
关键词
Sediment yield index; AHP; Watershed prioritization; Multi criteria decision making; GIS; Remote sensing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Watershed prioritization based on the natural resources and physical processes involves locating critical areas of erosion, which produce maximum sediment yield to take up conservation activities on priority basis. The present study was taken up with a specific objective of prioritization of micro-watersheds using Multi-Criteria Decision Approach – Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based SYI model (AHPSYI) under GIS environment for a case study area of Mayurakshi watershed in India. This method basically uses information of Potential Erosion Index (PEI) and Sediment Delivery Ratio (SDR), indicative of transport capacity. In the present study, sediment delivery factors viz., topography, vegetation cover, proximity to water courses and soil were translated into GIS layers and integrated using Boolean conditions to create a data layer of spatially distributed SDIs’ across the watershed. For assessment of PEI, important watershed parameters viz., land use/land cover, soil, slope, and drainage density maps were integrated in the GIS environment using Weighted Linear Combination method (WLC) by assigning weights to themes and ranks to features of individual theme using AHP technique. A comparison between AHPSYI based sub watershed prioritization map with that of prioritization map based on the observed sediment yield data revealed that about 78 % of the area showed concurrence. Thus, it can be inferred that the watershed prioritization based on only thematic layers can be dependable to maximum extent. Subsequently, proposed approach was adopted for prioritization of the study area at micro watershed scale, where area under high and very high categories together constitutes around 33 % of the study area. Around 100 micro-watersheds out of 276 watersheds are under moderate to very high category respectively, signifying the need for watershed management.
引用
收藏
页码:3555 / 3571
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Watershed Prioritization Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Technique and GIS
    Chowdary, V. M.
    Chakraborthy, D.
    Jeyaram, A.
    Murthy, Y. V. N. Krishna
    Sharma, J. R.
    Dadhwal, V. K.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2013, 27 (10) : 3555 - 3571
  • [2] Pythagorean Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Mohd, Wan Rosanisah Wan
    Abdullah, Lazim
    [J]. 13TH IMT-GT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS, STATISTICS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS (ICMSA2017), 2017, 1905
  • [3] Multi-criteria group decision making based on neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process
    Abdel-Basset, Mohamed
    Mohamed, Mai
    Zhou, Yongquan
    Hezam, Ibrahim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 33 (06) : 4055 - 4066
  • [4] A multi-criteria decision-making formulation of trust using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
    Mehrdad Ashtiani
    Mohammad Abdollahi Azgomi
    [J]. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2015, 17 : 465 - 488
  • [5] A multi-criteria decision-making formulation of trust using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
    Ashtiani, Mehrdad
    Azgomi, Mohammad Abdollahi
    [J]. COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2015, 17 (04) : 465 - 488
  • [6] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Application Maintenance Offshoring Using Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Rahman, Hanif Ur
    Raza, Mushtaq
    Afsar, Palwasha
    Alharbi, Abdullah
    Ahmad, Sultan
    Alyami, Hashym
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (18):
  • [7] Multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable wall paints and coatings using Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Rochikashvili, Mariia
    Bongaerts, Jan C.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT TALLINN AND HELSINKI CONFERENCE SBE16 BUILD GREEN AND RENOVATE DEEP, 2016, 96 : 923 - 933
  • [8] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach to Urban Web Service Databases Evaluation Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Zemtsov, Andrey
    Tran Dung Khanh
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR INTELLIGENT DECISION MAKING SUPPORT (ITIDS 2020), 2020, 174 : 283 - 287
  • [9] USING THE FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPROACH FOR SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS PRIORITIZATION
    Achimugu, Philip
    Selamat, Ali
    Ibrahim, Roliana
    [J]. JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2015, 77 (13): : 21 - 28
  • [10] Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Universities Ranking
    Aliyev, Rashad
    Temizkan, Hasan
    Aliyev, Rafig
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (08): : 1 - 15