Mixed mating in natural populations of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica

被引:0
|
作者
R E Marra
P Cortesi
M Bissegger
M G Milgroom
机构
[1] Cornell University,Department of Plant Pathology
[2] Istituto di Patologia Vegetale,Department of Plant Pathology and Ecology
[3] Università degli Studi di Milano,undefined
[4] Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station,undefined
来源
Heredity | 2004年 / 93卷
关键词
fungal mating system; mixed mating system; outcrossing; reproductive biology; selfing; self-fertilization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As in plants, fungi exhibit wide variation in reproductive strategies and mating systems. Although most sexually reproducing fungi are either predominantly outcrossing or predominantly selfing, there are some notable exceptions. The haploid, ascomycete chestnut blight pathogen, Cryphonectria parasitica, has previously been shown to have a mixed mating system in one population in USA. In this report, we show that both selfing and outcrossing occur in 10 additional populations of C. parasitica sampled from Japan, Italy, Switzerland and USA. Progeny arrays from each population were assayed for segregation at vegetative incompatibility (vic) and DNA fingerprinting loci. Outcrossing rates (t̂m) were estimated as the proportion of progeny arrays showing segregation at one or more loci, corrected by the probability of nondetection of outcrossing (α̂). Estimates of t̂m varied from 0.74 to 0.97, with the lowest rates consistently detected in USA populations (0.74–0.78). Five populations (four in USA and one in Italy) had t̂m significantly less than 1, supporting the conclusion that these populations exhibit mixed mating. The underlying causes of variation in outcrossing rates among populations of C. parasitica are not known, but we speculate that – as in plants – outcrossing is a function of ecological, demographic and genetic factors.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 195
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mixed mating in natural populations of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica
    Marra, RE
    Cortesi, P
    Bissegger, M
    Milgroom, MG
    [J]. HEREDITY, 2004, 93 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [2] Mixed mating in natural populations of the chestnut blight pathogen, Cryphonectria parasitica
    Marra, R. E.
    Cortesi, P.
    Bissegger, M.
    Milgroom, M. G.
    [J]. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 95 (06) : S171 - S171
  • [3] Viruses of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica
    Hillman, BI
    Suzuki, N
    [J]. ADVANCES IN VIRUS RESEARCH, VOL. 63, 2004, 63 : 423 - 472
  • [4] Analysis of mating-type genes in the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica
    McGuire, IC
    Marra, RE
    Turgeon, BG
    Milgroom, MG
    [J]. FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 34 (02) : 131 - 144
  • [5] Hypovirulence in chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica, in Slovakia
    Adamcikova, Katarina
    Ondruskova, Emilia
    Kobza, Marek
    [J]. BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 29 (09) : 840 - 851
  • [6] EUCALYPTS ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO THE CHESTNUT BLIGHT FUNGUS, CRYPHONECTRIA-PARASITICA
    OLD, KM
    KOBAYASHI, T
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1988, 36 (05) : 599 - 603
  • [7] Cytological and electrophoretic karyotyping of the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica
    Eusebio-Cope, Ana
    Suzuki, Nobuhiro
    Sadeghi-Garmaroodi, Hamid
    Taga, Masatoki
    [J]. FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 46 (04) : 342 - 351
  • [8] Invasion Genetics of the Chestnut Blight Fungus Cryphonectria parasitica in Switzerland
    Prospero, S.
    Rigling, D.
    [J]. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 102 (01) : 73 - 82
  • [9] Changes in Cryphonectria parasitica Populations Affect Natural Biological Control of Chestnut Blight
    Jezic, Marin
    Mlinarec, Jelena
    Vukovic, Rosemary
    Katanic, Zorana
    Krstin, Ljiljana
    Nuskern, Lucija
    Poljak, Igor
    Idzojtic, Marilena
    Tkalec, Mirta
    Curkovic-Perica, Mirna
    [J]. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 108 (07) : 870 - 877
  • [10] POPULATION BIOLOGY OF THE CHESTNUT BLIGHT FUNGUS, CRYPHONECTRIA-PARASITICA
    MILGROOM, MG
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1995, 73 : S311 - S319