Cyclic Seesaw Process for Optimization and Identification

被引:0
|
作者
James C. Spall
机构
[1] The Johns Hopkins University,Applied Physics Laboratory
[2] The Johns Hopkins University,Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics
来源
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications | 2012年 / 154卷
关键词
System identification; Parameter estimation; Alternating optimization; Cyclic optimization; Block coordinate optimization; Recursive estimation; Nondifferentiable;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A known approach to optimization is the cyclic (or alternating or block coordinate) method, where the full parameter vector is divided into two or more subvectors and the process proceeds by sequentially optimizing each of the subvectors, while holding the remaining parameters at their most recent values. One advantage of such a scheme is the preservation of potentially large investments in software, while allowing for an extension of capability to include new parameters for estimation. A specific case of interest involves cross-sectional data that is modeled in state–space form, where there is interest in estimating the mean vector and covariance matrix of the initial state vector as well as certain parameters associated with the dynamics of the underlying differential equations (e.g., power spectral density parameters). This paper shows that, under reasonable conditions, the cyclic scheme leads to parameter estimates that converge to the optimal joint value for the full vector of unknown parameters. Convergence conditions here differ from others in the literature. Further, relative to standard search methods on the full vector, numerical results here suggest a more general property of faster convergence for seesaw as a consequence of the more “aggressive” (larger) gain coefficient (step size) possible.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 208
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cyclic Seesaw Process for Optimization and Identification
    Spall, James C.
    JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 154 (01) : 187 - 208
  • [2] Cyclic Seesaw Optimization and Identification
    Spall, James C.
    2011 50TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL AND EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (CDC-ECC), 2011, : 4442 - 4447
  • [3] Asymptotic Normality and Efficiency Analysis of the Cyclic Seesaw Stochastic Optimization Algorithm
    Hernandez, Karla
    Spall, James C.
    2016 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2016, : 7255 - 7260
  • [4] AN OPTIMIZATION OF THE IDENTIFICATION PROCESS
    GAJDA, J
    SYSTEMS ANALYSIS MODELLING SIMULATION, 1991, 8 (10): : 783 - 794
  • [5] Extending Process Discovery with Model Complexity Optimization and Cyclic States Identification: Application to Healthcare Processes
    Elkhovskaya, Liubov O.
    Kshenin, Alexander D.
    Balakhontceva, Marina A.
    Ionov, Mikhail V.
    Kovalchuk, Sergey V.
    ALGORITHMS, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [6] Identification and modeling of sources by an optimization process
    Sidki, M.
    Nicolas, J.
    Proceedings - International Conference on Noise Control Engineering, 1988,
  • [7] On the integration of model identification and process optimization
    Recker, Sebastian
    Kerimoglu, Nimet
    Harwardt, Andreas
    Tkacheva, Olga
    Marquardt, Wolfgang
    23 EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2013, 32 : 1021 - 1026
  • [8] Interpretative identification of the faulty conditions in a cyclic manufacturing process
    Kozjek, Dominik
    Vrabic, Rok
    Kralj, David
    Butala, Peter
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2017, 43 : 214 - 224
  • [9] CONTROL OF CELL-GROWTH BY CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE SEESAW
    SHIELDS, R
    NATURE, 1974, 252 (5478) : 11 - 12
  • [10] Extrusion process control: Modeling, identification, and optimization
    Tibbetts, BR
    Wen, JTY
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 6 (02) : 134 - 145