Influence of light availability on growth, leaf morphology and plant architecture of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) saplings

被引:0
|
作者
Any Mary Petriţan
Burghard von Lüpke
Ion Catalin Petriţan
机构
[1] Georg-August University Göttingen,Department of Silviculture and Forest Ecology of the Temperate Zones
[2] Institute of Forest Research and Management,Department of Silviculture and Forest Ecology
[3] Transilvania University Brasov,Department of Forest Management
来源
关键词
Shade tolerance; Juvenile growth; Mixed species broad leaf stand; Tree architecture; Leaf morphology; Light availability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In a field study, we measured saplings of beech, ash and maple growing in a fairly even-aged mixed-species thicket established by natural regeneration beneath a patchy shelterwood canopy with 3–60% of above canopy radiation reaching the saplings. Under low light conditions, maple and ash showed a slight lead in recent annual length increment compared with beech. With increasing light, ash and maple constantly gained superiority in length increment, whereas beech approached an asymptotic value above 35% light. A suite of architectural and leaf morphological attributes indicated a more pronounced ability of beech to adapt to shade than ash and maple. Beech displayed its leaves along the entire tree height (with a concentration in the middle crown), yielding a higher live crown ratio than ash and maple. It allocated biomass preferentially to radial growth which resulted in low height to diameter ratios, and expressed marked plagiotropic growth in shade indicating a horizontal light-foraging strategy. In addition, beech exhibited the highest specific leaf area, a greater total leaf area per unit tree height, a slightly greater leaf area index, and a greater plasticity to light in total leaf area. Ash and maple presented a “gap species” growth strategy, characterized by a marked and constant response in growth rates to increasing light and an inability to strongly reduce their growth rates in deep shade. In shade, they showed some plasticity in displaying most of their leaf area at the top of the crown to minimize self-shading and to enhance light interception. Through this, particularly, maple developed an “umbrella” like crown. These species-specific responses may be used for controlling the development of mixed-species regeneration in shelterwood systems.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 74
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of light availability on growth, leaf morphology and plant architecture of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) saplings
    Petritan, Any Mary
    von Luepke, Burghard
    Petritan, Ion Catalin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2009, 128 (01) : 61 - 74
  • [2] A comparative analysis of foliar chemical composition and leaf construction costs of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) saplings along a light gradient
    Any Mary Petritan
    Burghard von Lüpke
    Ion Catalin Petritan
    Annals of Forest Science, 2010, 67 : 610 - 610
  • [3] A comparative analysis of foliar chemical composition and leaf construction costs of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) saplings along a light gradient
    Petritan, Any Mary
    von Luepke, Burghard
    Petritan, Ion Catalin
    ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2010, 67 (06) : 610 - 610
  • [4] Effects of shade on growth and mortality of maple (Acer pseudoplatanus), ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) saplings
    Petritan, Any Mary
    Von Luepke, Burghard
    Petritan, Ion Catalin
    FORESTRY, 2007, 80 (04): : 397 - 412
  • [5] Above and below ground carbohydrate allocation differs between ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)
    Thoms, Ronny
    Koehler, Michael
    Gessler, Arthur
    Gleixner, Gerd
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [6] Tree growth on skid trails - Do soil structure disturbances affect the growth of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.)?
    Ebeling, Corinna
    Franke, Lisa
    Merkel, Hubert
    Weidner, Andre
    Woermann, Pascal
    Gaertig, Thorsten
    ALLGEMEINE FORST UND JAGDZEITUNG, 2016, 187 (7-8): : 146 - 156
  • [7] Growth and nutrition of young European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) on sites with different nutrient and water statuses
    Weber-Blaschke, G.
    Heitz, R.
    Blaschke, M.
    Ammer, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2008, 127 (06) : 465 - 479
  • [8] Growth and nutrition of young European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) on sites with different nutrient and water statuses
    G. Weber-Blaschke
    R. Heitz
    M. Blaschke
    C. Ammer
    European Journal of Forest Research, 2008, 127
  • [9] Suitability of Bavarian forest sites for the cultivation of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.)
    Weber, G
    Bahr, B
    FORSTWISSENSCHAFTLICHES CENTRALBLATT, 2000, 119 (05): : 263 - 275
  • [10] Roots from beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) differentially affect soil microorganisms and carbon dynamics
    Cesarz, Simone
    Fender, Ann-Catrin
    Beyer, Friderike
    Valtanen, Kerttu
    Pfeiffer, Birgit
    Gansert, Dirk
    Hertel, Dietrich
    Polle, Andrea
    Daniel, Rolf
    Leuschner, Christoph
    Scheu, Stefan
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 61 : 23 - 32