Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines

被引:0
|
作者
Matthew Kennedy-Martin
Bernhard Slaap
Michael Herdman
Mandy van Reenen
Tessa Kennedy-Martin
Wolfgang Greiner
Jan Busschbach
Kristina S. Boye
机构
[1] Kennedy Martin Health Outcomes Ltd,Department of Psychiatry, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy
[2] Erasmus MC,Department of Health Economics at the School of Public Health
[3] EuroQol Research Foundation,undefined
[4] Office of Health Economics (OHE),undefined
[5] Bielefeld University,undefined
[6] Eli Lilly and Company,undefined
关键词
Health technology assessment; Cost-utility analysis; Multi-attribute utility instruments; Pharmacoeconomics; Guidelines; Utility; i11, i18;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:1245 / 1257
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines
    Kennedy-Martin, Matthew
    Slaap, Bernhard
    Herdman, Michael
    van Reenen, Mandy
    Kennedy-Martin, Tessa
    Greiner, Wolfgang
    Busschbach, Jan
    Boye, Kristina S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2020, 21 (08): : 1245 - 1257
  • [2] Assessing outcomes for cost-utility analysis in depression: comparison of five multi-attribute utility instruments with two depression-specific outcome measures
    Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
    Chen, Gang
    Lezzi, Angelo
    Khan, Munir A.
    Richardson, Jeffrey
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 205 (05) : 390 - 397
  • [3] Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods
    Bahrampour, Mina
    Byrnes, Joshua
    Norman, Richard
    Scuffham, Paul A.
    Downes, Martin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2020, 21 (07): : 983 - 992
  • [4] Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods
    Mina Bahrampour
    Joshua Byrnes
    Richard Norman
    Paul A. Scuffham
    Martin Downes
    [J]. The European Journal of Health Economics, 2020, 21 : 983 - 992
  • [5] Systematic Review of the Psychometric Performance of Generic Childhood Multi-attribute Utility Instruments
    Joseph Kwon
    Sarah Smith
    Rakhee Raghunandan
    Martin Howell
    Elisabeth Huynh
    Sungwook Kim
    Thomas Bentley
    Nia Roberts
    Emily Lancsar
    Kirsten Howard
    Germaine Wong
    Jonathan Craig
    Stavros Petrou
    [J]. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2023, 21 : 559 - 584
  • [6] A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations
    Gang Chen
    Julie Ratcliffe
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2015, 33 : 1013 - 1028
  • [7] A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations
    Chen, Gang
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2015, 33 (10) : 1013 - 1028
  • [8] Systematic Review of the Psychometric Performance of Generic Childhood Multi-attribute Utility Instruments
    Kwon, Joseph
    Smith, Sarah
    Raghunandan, Rakhee
    Howell, Martin
    Huynh, Elisabeth
    Kim, Sungwook
    Bentley, Thomas
    Roberts, Nia
    Lancsar, Emily
    Howard, Kirsten
    Wong, Germaine
    Craig, Jonathan
    Petrou, Stavros
    [J]. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2023, 21 (04) : 559 - 584
  • [9] Exploration of health dimensions to be included in multi-attribute health-utility assessment
    Perneger, Thomas V.
    Courvoisier, Delphine S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2011, 23 (01) : 52 - 59
  • [10] Perceptions of women on the impact of menorrhagia on their health using multi-attribute utility assessment
    Shaw, RW
    Brickley, MR
    Evans, L
    Edwards, MJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 105 (11): : 1155 - 1159