Study on the extension of the dynamic benchmark system of per capita carbon emissions in China’s county

被引:0
|
作者
Fengmei Yang
Longyu Shi
Xiaotong Wang
Lijie Gao
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
[3] Xiamen Institute of Technology,undefined
关键词
Carbon intensity reduction target allocation; Capacity-responsibility; County; Per capita carbon emissions; Dynamic benchmark;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
County is the center of China’s socio-economic development and the key node for urban–rural integration. Also, the county is an important carrier for promoting urban and rural green development. Improving green and low-carbon development capabilities and formulating county-level low-carbon standards will play a significant role in promoting China’s new people-oriented urbanization and rural revitalization. Although there have been extensive studies on low-carbon benchmarks, over half of the benchmarks tend to ignore the development stage of the evaluated region and its needs. When the region’s economy reaches a certain level, constraints from low-carbon targets may limit the local development process. This study firstly allocated county carbon intensity reduction targets (CIRT) by considering the differences in county carbon reduction capacity and responsibility. Secondly, a dynamic benchmark system of per capita carbon emissions (PCCE) in counties in China is constructed. Finally, we took Changxing County in Zhejiang Province as a research case to verify the dynamic benchmark of PCCE. According to the carbon intensity target reduction rate (CITRR), China’s counties can be divided into three categories: low carbon emissions reduction capability-responsible counties (L-CERCRC), medium carbon emissions reduction capability-responsible counties (M-CERCRC), and high carbon emissions reduction capability-responsible counties (H-CERCRC). The results show that (1) due to the national CO2 emission reduction target in 2030, the carbon intensity will be 60% lower than in 2005, the CITRR for China’s 1510 counties range from 8.36 to 137.83%; the average CITRR is 48.40%. (2) Changxing County’s CITRR is 57.71%, which belongs to the H-CERCRC. The PCCE of Changxing County will be much higher than the benchmark when the carbon peak is reached in the future. (3) For reaching the aiming benchmark, Changxing County is suggested to adjust its relevant influencing factors of PCCE for converting local’s PCCE reaching to the benchmark within a certain time period. The dynamic benchmark system for PCCE in China’s counties established in this study is economically sensitive, which not only takes the differences of counties into account, but also meets the needs of counties’ diverse development form stages. This system provides counties a few coordinated directions which can improve the local’s economic development and reduce greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions through the development progress.
引用
收藏
页码:10256 / 10271
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on the extension of the dynamic benchmark system of per capita carbon emissions in China's county
    Yang, Fengmei
    Shi, Longyu
    Wang, Xiaotong
    Gao, Lijie
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (04) : 10256 - 10271
  • [2] A Dynamic Benchmark System for Per Capita Carbon Emissions in Low-Carbon Counties of China
    Gao, Lijie
    Shang, Xiaoqi
    Yang, Fengmei
    Shi, Longyu
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (03)
  • [3] Study of county-level low-carbon standards in China based on carbon emissions per capita
    Hou, L.
    Tang, L.
    Qian, Y.
    Chen, H.
    Wang, L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (08): : 698 - 707
  • [4] Club Convergence and Factors of Per Capita Transportation Carbon Emissions in China
    Bai, Caiquan
    Mao, Yuehua
    Gong, Yuan
    Feng, Chen
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (02)
  • [5] Convergence of per capita carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Yu, Shiwei
    Hu, Xing
    Zhang, Xuejiao
    Li, Zhenxi
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 30 (05) : 776 - 799
  • [6] Per capita carbon dioxide emissions: Convergence or divergence?
    Aldy, JE
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2006, 33 (04): : 533 - 555
  • [7] Are per capita carbon emissions predictable across countries?
    Lin, Cheng-Kuan
    Chen, Tom
    Li, Xihao
    De Marcellis-Warin, Nathalie
    Zigler, Corwin
    Christiani, David C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 237 : 569 - 575
  • [8] Per Capita Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Convergence or Divergence?
    Joseph E. Aldy
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2006, 33 : 533 - 555
  • [9] Spatial Non-Equilibrium and Its Solidification Effect of China's Per Capita Transportation Carbon Emissions
    Bai, Caiquan
    Kang, Ying
    Wang, Ximei
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2021, 30 (02): : 1051 - 1066
  • [10] Per capita carbon emissions must fall to 1955 levels
    Gregg Marland
    Tom Oda
    Thomas A. Boden
    [J]. Nature, 2019, 565 (7741) : 567 - 567