Key questions in the genetics and genomics of eco-evolutionary dynamics

被引:0
|
作者
A P Hendry
机构
[1] Redpath Museum,Department of Biology
[2] McGill University,undefined
来源
Heredity | 2013年 / 111卷
关键词
adaptation; population dynamics; community structure; ecosystem function; adaptive divergence; heritability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Increasing acceptance that evolution can be ‘rapid’ (or ‘contemporary’) has generated growing interest in the consequences for ecology. The genetics and genomics of these ‘eco-evolutionary dynamics’ will be—to a large extent—the genetics and genomics of organismal phenotypes. In the hope of stimulating research in this area, I review empirical data from natural populations and draw the following conclusions. (1) Considerable additive genetic variance is present for most traits in most populations. (2) Trait correlations do not consistently oppose selection. (3) Adaptive differences between populations often involve dominance and epistasis. (4) Most adaptation is the result of genes of small-to-modest effect, although (5) some genes certainly have larger effects than the others. (6) Adaptation by independent lineages to similar environments is mostly driven by different alleles/genes. (7) Adaptation to new environments is mostly driven by standing genetic variation, although new mutations can be important in some instances. (8) Adaptation is driven by both structural and regulatory genetic variation, with recent studies emphasizing the latter. (9) The ecological effects of organisms, considered as extended phenotypes, are often heritable. Overall, the study of eco-evolutionary dynamics will benefit from perspectives and approaches that emphasize standing genetic variation in many genes of small-to-modest effect acting across multiple traits and that analyze overall adaptation or ‘fitness’. In addition, increasing attention should be paid to dominance, epistasis and regulatory variation.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 466
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Key questions in the genetics and genomics of eco-evolutionary dynamics
    Hendry, A. P.
    [J]. HEREDITY, 2013, 111 (06) : 456 - 466
  • [2] Key Questions on the Role of Phenotypic Plasticity in Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics
    Hendry, Andrew P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 2016, 107 (01) : 25 - 41
  • [3] ECO-EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS
    MacColl, Andrew
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2017, 92 (03): : 321 - 322
  • [4] Eco-evolutionary dynamics
    Hendry, Andrew
    [J]. GENES & GENETIC SYSTEMS, 2012, 87 (06) : 374 - 374
  • [5] Eco-evolutionary dynamics
    Pelletier, F.
    Garant, D.
    Hendry, A. P.
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 364 (1523) : 1483 - 1489
  • [6] Eco-Evolutionary Genomics of Chromosomal Inversions
    Wellenreuther, Maren
    Bernatchez, Louis
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2018, 33 (06) : 427 - 440
  • [7] Cryptic eco-evolutionary dynamics
    Kinnison, Michael T.
    Hairston, Nelson G., Jr.
    Hendry, Andrew P.
    [J]. YEAR IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2015, 1360 : 120 - 144
  • [8] A critique for eco-evolutionary dynamics
    Hendry, Andrew P.
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 33 (01) : 84 - 94
  • [9] Eco-evolutionary dynamics of autotomy
    Rohan S. Mehta
    Julie A. Kraus
    [J]. Theoretical Ecology, 2021, 14 : 445 - 465
  • [10] Eco-evolutionary dynamics of autotomy
    Mehta, Rohan S.
    Kraus, Julie A.
    [J]. THEORETICAL ECOLOGY, 2021, 14 (03) : 445 - 465