Pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in multiple myeloma

被引:0
|
作者
Claudio Cerchione
Davide Nappi
Giovanni Martinelli
机构
[1] IRCCS,Hematology Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori “Dino Amadori” (IRST)
[2] Ospedale di Bolzano,Department of Hematology and Cell Bone Marrow Transplantation (CBMT)
来源
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2021年 / 29卷
关键词
Pegfilgrastim; Multiple myeloma; G-CSF; Supportive care; Febrile neutropenia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multiple myeloma (MM) survival rates have been substantially increased thanks to novel agents that have improved survival outcomes and shown better tolerability than treatments of earlier years. These new agents include immunomodulating imide drugs (IMiD) thalidomide and lenalidomide, the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (PI), recently followed by new generation IMID pomalidomide, monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and elotuzumab, and next generation PI carfilzomib and ixazomib. However, even in this more promising scenario, febrile neutropenia remains a severe side effect of antineoplastic therapies and can lead to a delay and/or dose reduction in subsequent cycles. Supportive care has thus become key in helping patients to obtain the maximum benefit from novel agents. Filgrastim is a human recombinant subcutaneous preparation of G-CSF, largely adopted in hematological supportive care as “on demand” (or secondary) prophylaxis to recovery from neutropenia and its infectious consequences during anti-myeloma treatment. On the contrary, pegfilgrastim is a pegylated long-acting recombinant form of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) that, given its extended half-life, can be particularly useful when adopted as “primary prophylaxis,” therefore before the onset of neutropenia, along chemotherapy treatment in multiple myeloma patients. There is no direct comparison between the two G-CSF delivery modalities. In this review, we compare data on the two administrations’ modality, highlighting the efficacy of the secondary prophylaxis over multiple myeloma treatment. Advantage of pegfilgrastim could be as follows: the fixed administration rather than multiple injections, reduction in neutropenia and febrile neutropenia rates, and, finally, a cost-effectiveness advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:6973 / 6980
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in multiple myeloma
    Cerchione, Claudio
    Nappi, Davide
    Martinelli, Giovanni
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (11) : 6973 - 6980
  • [2] PEGFILGRASTIM AS PROPHYLAXIS OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA DURING CHEMOTHERAPY OF RELAPSED AND REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA
    Cerchione, C.
    Pugliese, N.
    Marano, L.
    Cerciello, G.
    Avilia, S.
    Pane, F.
    Catalano, L.
    [J]. HAEMATOLOGICA, 2013, 98 : 424 - 424
  • [3] Overuse and underuse of pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia
    Zullo, Andrew R.
    Lou, Uvette
    Cabral, Sarah E.
    Huynh, Justin
    Berard-Collins, Christine M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (06) : 1357 - 1365
  • [4] Pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a real-life experience
    Claudio Cerchione
    Lucio Catalano
    Anna Emanuele Pareto
    Marco Picardi
    Fabrizio Pane
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2015, 23 : 301 - 302
  • [5] Pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a real-life experience
    Cerchione, Claudio
    Catalano, Lucio
    Pareto, Anna Emanuele
    Picardi, Marco
    Pane, Fabrizio
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (02) : 301 - +
  • [6] Pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients undergoing TAC chemotherapy
    Lee, Jihyoun
    Lee, Jong Eun
    Kim, Zisun
    Han, Sun Wook
    Hur, Sung Mo
    Kim, Sung Yong
    Lee, Min Hyuk
    Lim, Cheol Wan
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 94 (05) : 223 - 228
  • [7] Cost Effectiveness of Primary Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis in Patients With Breast Cancer at Risk of Febrile Neutropenia
    Aarts, Maureen J.
    Grutters, Janneke P.
    Peters, Frank P.
    Mandigers, Caroline M.
    Dercksen, M. Wouter
    Stouthard, Jacqueline M.
    Nortier, Hans J.
    van Laarhoven, Hanneke W.
    van Warmerdam, Laurence J.
    van de Wouw, Agnes J.
    Jacobs, Esther M.
    Mattijssen, Vera
    van der Rijt, Carin C.
    Smilde, Tineke J.
    van der Velden, Annette W.
    Temizkan, Mehmet
    Batman, Erdogan
    Muller, Erik W.
    van Gastel, Saskia M.
    Joore, Manuela A.
    Borm, George F.
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (34) : 4283 - 4289
  • [8] Cost comparison of filgrastim versus pegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim biosimilars for inpatient prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia
    Singer, Kaeli
    Forshay, Charlotte M. M.
    Kennerly-Shah, Julie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2023, 29 (07) : 1695 - 1701
  • [9] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PRIMARY PEGFILGRASTIM PROPHYLAXIS IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS AT RISK OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA
    Aarts, M. J.
    Grutters, J. P.
    Peters, F. P.
    Mandigers, C. M.
    Dercksen, M. W.
    Stouthard, J. M.
    Nortier, J. W.
    van Laarhoven, H. W.
    van Warmerdam, L. J.
    Tjan-Heijnen, V. C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 501 - 501
  • [10] Cost-Effectiveness of Filgrastim and Pegfilgrastim as Primary Prophylaxis Against Febrile Neutropenia in Lymphoma Patients
    Lathia, Nina
    Isogai, Pierre K.
    De Angelis, Carlo
    Smith, Thomas J.
    Cheung, Matthew
    Mittmann, Nicole
    Hoch, Jeffrey S.
    Walker, Scott
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2013, 105 (15) : 1078 - 1085