Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Impairs Aphid Escape Responses to Predators and Conspecific Alarm Signals

被引:0
|
作者
William T. Hentley
Adam J. Vanbergen
Rosemary S. Hails
T. Hefin Jones
Scott N. Johnson
机构
[1] Cardiff University,Cardiff School of Biosciences
[2] Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH),Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment
[3] The James Hutton Institute,undefined
[4] CEH,undefined
[5] Bush Estate,undefined
[6] University of Western Sydney,undefined
来源
关键词
Aphid; Chemical signals; Climate change; Tri-trophic interactions; Pheromones;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research into the impact of atmospheric change on predator–prey interactions has mainly focused on density dependent responses and trophic linkages. As yet, the chemical ecology underpinning predator–prey interactions has received little attention in environmental change research. Group living animals have evolved behavioral mechanisms to escape predation, including chemical alarm signalling. Chemical alarm signalling between conspecific prey could be susceptible to environmental change if the physiology and behavior of these organisms are affected by changes in dietary quality resulting from environmental change. Using Rubus idaeus plants, we show that elevated concentrations of atmospheric CO2 (eCO2) severely impaired escape responses of the aphid Amphorophora idaei to predation by ladybird larvae (Harmonia axyridis). Escape responses to ladybirds was reduced by >50 % after aphids had been reared on plants grown under eCO2. This behavioral response was rapidly induced, occurring within 24 h of being transferred to plants grown at eCO2 and, once induced, persisted even after aphids were transferred to plants grown at ambient CO2. Escape responses were impaired due to reduced sensitivity to aphid alarm pheromone, (E)-β-farnesene, via an undefined plant-mediated mechanism. Aphid abundance often increases under eCO2, however, reduced efficacy of conspecific signalling may increase aphid vulnerability to predation, highlighting the need to study the chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions under environmental change.
引用
收藏
页码:1110 / 1114
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Impairs Aphid Escape Responses to Predators and Conspecific Alarm Signals
    Hentley, William T.
    Vanbergen, Adam J.
    Hails, Rosemary S.
    Jones, T. Hefin
    Johnson, Scott N.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 40 (10) : 1110 - 1114
  • [2] How general are aphid responses to elevated atmospheric CO2?
    Bezemer, TM
    Knight, KJ
    Newington, JE
    Jones, TH
    ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 92 (05) : 724 - 730
  • [3] How predictable are aphid population responses to elevated CO2?
    Newman, JA
    Gibson, DJ
    Parsons, AJ
    Thornley, JHM
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2003, 72 (04) : 556 - 566
  • [4] Temporal variability in tree responses to elevated atmospheric CO2
    Lauriks, Fran
    Salomon, Roberto Luis
    Steppe, Kathy
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 44 (05): : 1292 - 1310
  • [5] Aphid response to elevated ozone and CO2
    Holopainen, JK
    ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA, 2002, 104 (01) : 137 - 142
  • [6] Plant responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 among terrestrial biomes
    Wilsey, BJ
    OIKOS, 1996, 76 (01) : 201 - 206
  • [7] Phloem phytochemistry and aphid responses to elevated CO2, nitrogen fertilization and endophyte infection
    Ryan, Geraldine D.
    Shukla, Kruti
    Rasmussen, Susanne
    Shelp, Barry J.
    Newman, Jonathan A.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST ENTOMOLOGY, 2014, 16 (03) : 273 - 283
  • [8] PLANT-RESPONSES TO SALINITY UNDER ELEVATED ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATIONS OF CO2
    BALL, MC
    MUNNS, R
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1992, 40 (4-5) : 515 - 525
  • [9] Responses of two Populus clones to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration in the field
    Tognetti, R
    Longobucco, A
    Raschi, A
    Miglietta, F
    Fumagalli, I
    ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE, 1999, 56 (06) : 493 - 500
  • [10] Soil nematodes indicate food web responses to elevated atmospheric CO2
    Hoeksema, JD
    Lussenhop, J
    Teeri, JA
    PEDOBIOLOGIA, 2000, 44 (06) : 725 - 735