Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study

被引:0
|
作者
Vincenzo Tullo
Gianni Allais
Michel D. Ferrari
Marcella Curone
Eliana Mea
Stefano Omboni
Chiara Benedetto
Dario Zava
Gennaro Bussone
机构
[1] National Neurological Institute Carlo Besta,Department of Clinical Neurosciences
[2] University of Torino,Women’s Headache Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
[3] Leiden University Medical Centre,Leiden Centre for Translational Neuroscience, Department of Neurology
[4] Italian Institute of Telemedicine,undefined
[5] Istituto Lusofarmaco d’Italia,undefined
来源
Neurological Sciences | 2010年 / 31卷
关键词
Migraine; Frovatriptan; Zolmitriptan; Patient preference;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study is to assess patients’ satisfaction with migraine treatment with frovatriptan (F) or zolmitriptan (Z), by preference questionnaire. 133 subjects with a history of migraine with or without aura (IHS criteria) were randomized to F 2.5 mg or Z 2.5 mg. The study had a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over design, with each of the two treatment periods lasting no more than 3 months. At the end of the study, patients were asked to assign preference to one of the treatments (primary endpoint). The number of pain-free (PF) and pain-relief (PR) episodes at 2 h, and number of recurrent and sustained pain-free (SPF) episodes within 48 h were the secondary study endpoints. Seventy-seven percent of patients expressed a preference. Average score of preference was 2.9 ± 1.3 (F) versus 3.0 ± 1.3 (Z; p = NS). Rate of PF episodes at 2 h was 26% with F and 31% with Z (p = NS). PR episodes at 2 h were 57% for F and 58% for Z (p = NS). Rate of recurrence was 21 (F) and 24% (Z; p = NS). Time to recurrence within 48 h was better for F especially between 4 and 16 h (p < 0.05). SPF episodes were 18 (F) versus 22% (Z; p = NS). Drug-related adverse events were significantly (p < 0.05) less under F (3 vs. 10). In conclusion, our study suggests that F has a similar efficacy of Z, with some advantage as regards tolerability and recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 54
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study
    Tullo, Vincenzo
    Allais, Gianni
    Ferrari, Michel D.
    Curone, Marcella
    Mea, Eliana
    Omboni, Stefano
    Benedetto, Chiara
    Zava, Dario
    Bussone, Gennaro
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 31 : 51 - 54
  • [2] Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine with aura: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study
    Tullo, Vincenzo
    Allais, Gianni
    Curone, Marcella
    Ferrari, Michel D.
    Omboni, Stefano
    Benedetto, Chiara
    Colombo, Bruno
    Zava, Dario
    Bussone, Gennaro
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 33 : S61 - S64
  • [3] Frovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine with aura: a subgroup analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study
    Vincenzo Tullo
    Gianni Allais
    Marcella Curone
    Michel D. Ferrari
    Stefano Omboni
    Chiara Benedetto
    Bruno Colombo
    Dario Zava
    Gennaro Bussone
    [J]. Neurological Sciences, 2012, 33 : 61 - 64
  • [4] A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study of frovatriptan versus rizatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine
    Lidia Savi
    Stefano Omboni
    Carlo Lisotto
    Giorgio Zanchin
    Michel D. Ferrari
    Dario Zava
    Lorenzo Pinessi
    [J]. The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2011, 12 : 219 - 226
  • [5] A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study of frovatriptan versus rizatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine
    Savi, Lidia
    Omboni, Stefano
    Lisotto, Carlo
    Zanchin, Giorgio
    Ferrari, Michel D.
    Zava, Dario
    Pinessi, Lorenzo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2011, 12 (02): : 219 - 226
  • [6] A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study of frovatriptan versus almotriptan for the acute treatment of migraine
    Bartolini, Marco
    Giamberardino, Maria Adele
    Lisotto, Carlo
    Martelletti, Paolo
    Moscato, Davide
    Panascia, Biagio
    Savi, Lidia
    Pini, Luigi Alberto
    Sances, Grazia
    Santoro, Patrizia
    Zanchin, Giorgio
    Omboni, Stefano
    Ferrari, Michel D.
    Brighina, Filippo
    Fierro, Brigida
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2011, 12 (03): : 361 - 368
  • [7] A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study of frovatriptan versus almotriptan for the acute treatment of migraine
    Marco Bartolini
    Maria Adele Giamberardino
    Carlo Lisotto
    Paolo Martelletti
    Davide Moscato
    Biagio Panascia
    Lidia Savi
    Luigi Alberto Pini
    Grazia Sances
    Patrizia Santoro
    Giorgio Zanchin
    Stefano Omboni
    Michel D. Ferrari
    Filippo Brighina
    Brigida Fierro
    [J]. The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2011, 12 : 361 - 368
  • [8] Efficacy of frovatriptan in the acute treatment of menstrually related migraine: analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian, comparative study versus zolmitriptan
    Allais, Gianni
    Tullo, Vincenzo
    Benedetto, Chiara
    Zava, Dario
    Omboni, Stefano
    Bussone, Gennaro
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 32 : S99 - S104
  • [9] Efficacy of frovatriptan in the acute treatment of menstrually related migraine: analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian, comparative study versus zolmitriptan
    Gianni Allais
    Vincenzo Tullo
    Chiara Benedetto
    Dario Zava
    Stefano Omboni
    Gennaro Bussone
    [J]. Neurological Sciences, 2011, 32 : 99 - 104
  • [10] Frovatriptan vs. Zolmitriptan in the acute treatment of menstrually-related migraine: analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, comparative study
    Allais, G.
    Tullo, V.
    Ferrari, M. D.
    Benedetto, C.
    Zava, D.
    Bussone, G.
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2011, 31 (01) : 124 - 124