Comparative evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of clear aligners - a systematic review

IntroductionThe clinical effectiveness of clear aligners depends on the material properties both physical and mechanical. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the physical and mechanical properties of different clear aligner materials and changes in the same during and after intra-oral use.MethodsSearch was done in five electronic databases: Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Ovid individually by two reviewers. In vivo, Ex vivo and In vitro studies that evaluated the physical and mechanical properties of clear aligner materials were selected. The risk of bias assessment was performed using a modified Cochrane risk of bias tool.ResultsFrom the 24 articles selected, 19 evaluated a single physical property and 23 articles evaluated a single mechanical property of clear aligner materials. All domains in the risk of bias assessment showed low risk of bias except for 'blinding of outcome' which was unclear in almost all the selected studies. Properties such as hardness, optical properties, stiffness, and yield strength were found to be different for different clear aligner materials and were found to change with thermoforming, with intra-oral aging, and in simulated intraoral conditions. Due to heterogenicity in the parameters used to assess physical or mechanical properties a meta-analysis could not be done.ConclusionsProperties like hardness, color, stiffness, stress relaxation and creep behavior were different for various clear aligner materials and were found to deteriorate with thermoforming and intra-oral aging. Polyurethane-based materials have a higher level of hardness and stiffness but exhibit increased creep and stress relaxation properties.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021269597.