A comparison of road traffic culture, risk assessment and speeding predictors between Norway and Turkey

被引:0
|
作者
Trond Nordfjærn
Özlem Şimşekoğlu
Torbjørn Rundmo
机构
[1] The Norwegian University of Science and Technology,Department of Psychology
[2] Gediz University,Department of Psychology
[3] Izmir University of Economics,Department of Psychology
来源
Risk Management | 2012年 / 14卷
关键词
road traffic culture; symbol use; cross-cultural; Norway; Turkey;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present study investigated differences in road traffic culture in Norway and Turkey. Differences in non-transport accidental risk perception and risk willingness were also examined. An additional aim was to scrutinise differences in how these constructs predict speeding and rule violations in the two countries. The results are based on a questionnaire survey conducted in samples of Norwegian (n=247) and Turkish (n=213) road users. Culture was operationalised by an instrument of communication by symbols in road traffic and fatalistic attributions of road traffic accidents. The results showed that Turkish road users reported more fatalistic beliefs and focused more on written information and sounds in road traffic. These road users were more willing to take risks and reported greater non-transport accidental risk perception. Norwegian drivers put greater emphasis on oral and visual traffic information. Norwegians also reported more extroverted orientations in traffic. The cultural variables were found to be relatively weak predictors of speeding and rule violations in both countries, but somewhat stronger predictors in Turkey. Fatalism was the most important predictor of risky driving in Turkey, where, in contrast, a visual road traffic orientation was the strongest predictor of reduced risk behaviour in road traffic.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 221
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of road traffic culture, risk assessment and speeding predictors between Norway and Turkey
    Nordfjaern, Trond
    Simsekoglu, Ozlem
    Rundmo, Torbjorn
    [J]. RISK MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2012, 14 (03): : 202 - 221
  • [2] Traffic risk perception, road safety attitudes, and behaviors among road users: a comparison of Turkey and Norway
    Simsekoglu, Ozlem
    Nordfjaern, Trond
    Rundmo, Torbjorn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2012, 15 (07) : 787 - 800
  • [3] A comparison of actual and perceived risk of apprehension for speeding in Norway
    Elvik, Rune
    [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2025, 209
  • [4] Risk of road traffic injury in Norway 1970-2022
    Elvik, Rune
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2024, 202
  • [5] Analysis of Road Traffic Accidents in Turkey between 2013 and 2017
    Erenler, Ali Kemal
    Gumus, Burak
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2019, 55 (10):
  • [6] Hazard and risk assessment for early phase road planning in Norway
    Solheim, Anders
    Sverdrup-Thygeson, Kjetil
    Kalsnes, Bjorn
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2023, 119 (02) : 943 - 963
  • [7] Hazard and risk assessment for early phase road planning in Norway
    Anders Solheim
    Kjetil Sverdrup-Thygeson
    Bjørn Kalsnes
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2023, 119 : 943 - 963
  • [8] Comparison of risk factors associated with sepsis between road traffic injuries and non-road traffic injuries in ICU patients with severe trauma
    Ma, Xiao-Yuan
    Jin, Huai-Jian
    Cheng, Shao-Wen
    Tang, Wan-Qi
    Ma, Wei
    Luo, Li
    Yang, Xue
    Wang, Qian
    Wang, Bin
    Liang, Hui-Ping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACUTE DISEASE, 2018, 7 (05) : 191 - 196
  • [9] Road traffic noise -: the relationship between noise exposure and noise annoyance in Norway
    Klæboe, R
    Amundsen, AH
    Fyhri, A
    Solberg, S
    [J]. APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2004, 65 (09) : 893 - 912
  • [10] Comparison between qualitative rockfall risk rating systems for a road affected by high traffic intensity
    Budetta, P.
    Nappi, M.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 13 (06) : 1643 - 1653