Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients

被引:6
|
作者
Toyoda D. [1 ]
Shinoda S. [1 ]
Kotake Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesiology, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 2-17-6, Ohashi, Meguro, Tokyo
关键词
Acute kidney injury; Coagulopathy; Colloid; Critically ill; Hydroxyethyl starch; Severe sepsis;
D O I
10.1186/2052-0492-2-23
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Proper fluid management is crucial for the management of critically ill patients. However, there is a continuing debate about the choice of the fluid, i.e., crystalloid vs. colloid. Colloid solution is theoretically advantageous to the crystalloid because of larger volume effect and less interstitial fluid accumulation, and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is most frequently used for perioperative setting. Nevertheless, application of HES solution is relatively limited due to its side effects including renal toxicity and coagulopathy. Since prolonged presence of large HES molecule is responsible for these side effects, rapidly degradable HES solution with low degree of substitution (tetrastarch) supposedly has less potential for negative effects. Thus, tetrastarch may be more frequently used in the ICU setting. However, several large-scale randomized trials reported that administration of tetrastarch solution to the patients with severe sepsis has negative effects on mortality and renal function. These results triggered further debate and regulatory responses around the world. This narrative review intended to describe the currently available evidence about the advantages and disadvantages of tetrastarch in the ICU setting.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transpulmonary pressure monitoring in critically ill patients: pros and cons
    Ball, Lorenzo
    Talmor, Daniel
    Pelosi, Paolo
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [2] Routine use of indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients: pros and cons
    De Waele, Elisabeth
    van Zanten, Arthur R. H.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 26 (01)
  • [3] Routine use of indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients: pros and cons
    Elisabeth De Waele
    Arthur R. H. van Zanten
    [J]. Critical Care, 26
  • [4] Pros and cons of Infusion therapie in critically ill patients in intensive care medicine
    Schuettler, Juergen
    [J]. ANASTHESIOLOGIE & INTENSIVMEDIZIN, 2010, 51 : 200 - 201
  • [5] De-escalation Antimicrobial Chemotherapy in Critically Ill Patients: Pros and Cons
    Antonelli, M.
    Mercurio, G.
    Di Nunno, S.
    Recchioni, G.
    Deangelis, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 13 : 218 - 223
  • [6] The Pros and Cons of the PROs
    Thoma, Achilleas
    Eaves, Felmont F., III
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2018, 38 (03) : 343 - 345
  • [7] IMPACT OF TETRASTARCH INFUSION ON THE INCIDENCE OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN SURGICAL CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 3362 PATIENTS
    Ertmer, C.
    Rehberg, S.
    Gess, J.
    Morelli, A.
    Volkert, T.
    Lange, M.
    Huesing, A.
    Kampmeier, T.
    Van Aken, H.
    Westphal, M.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 37 : S255 - S255
  • [8] Erythropoietin in cancer patients: pros and cons
    Dicato, Mario
    Plawny, Laurent
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2010, 22 (04) : 307 - 311
  • [9] THE PROS OF CONS
    Chant, Ian
    [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2016, 141 (12) : 26 - 29
  • [10] PROS AND CONS
    不详
    [J]. LANCET, 1949, 257 (SEP3): : 440 - 440