Automated causal inference in application to randomized controlled clinical trials

被引:0
|
作者
Ji Q. Wu
Nanda Horeweg
Marco de Bruyn
Remi A. Nout
Ina M. Jürgenliemk-Schulz
Ludy C. H. W. Lutgens
Jan J. Jobsen
Elzbieta M. van der Steen-Banasik
Hans W. Nijman
Vincent T. H. B. M. Smit
Tjalling Bosse
Carien L. Creutzberg
Viktor H. Koelzer
机构
[1] University of Zurich,Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital
[2] Leiden University Medical Center,Department of Radiation Oncology
[3] University of Groningen,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[4] University Medical Center,Department of Radiation Oncology
[5] University Medical Center Utrecht,Department of Radiotherapy
[6] Maastricht Radiation Oncology Clinic,Department of Pathology
[7] Medisch Spectrum Twente,Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute
[8] Radiotherapiegroep,Department of Clinical Epidemiology
[9] Leiden University Medical Center,undefined
[10] University Medical Center Rotterdam,undefined
[11] Medisch Spectrum Twente,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for testing causal hypotheses in the clinical domain; however, the investigation of prognostic variables of patient outcome in a hypothesized cause–effect route is not feasible using standard statistical methods. Here we propose a new automated causal inference method (AutoCI) built on the invariant causal prediction (ICP) framework for the causal reinterpretation of clinical trial data. Compared with existing methods, we show that the proposed AutoCI allows one to clearly determine the causal variables of two real-world RCTs of patients with endometrial cancer with mature outcome and extensive clinicopathological and molecular data. This is achieved via suppressing the causal probability of non-causal variables by a wide margin. In ablation studies, we further demonstrate that the assignment of causal probabilities by AutoCI remains consistent in the presence of confounders. In conclusion, these results confirm the robustness and feasibility of AutoCI for future applications in real-world clinical analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 444
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automated causal inference in application to randomized controlled clinical trials
    Wu, Ji Q.
    Horeweg, Nanda
    de Bruyn, Marco
    Nout, Remi A.
    Jurgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M.
    Lutgens, Ludy C. H. W.
    Jobsen, Jan J.
    Van der Steen-Banasik, Elzbieta M.
    Nijman, Hans W.
    Smit, Vincent T. H. B. M.
    Bosse, Tjalling
    Creutzberg, Carien L.
    Koelzer, Viktor H.
    [J]. NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 4 (05) : 436 - +
  • [2] Causal inference in randomized clinical trials
    Zheng, Cheng
    Dai, Ran
    Gale, Robert Peter
    Zhang, Mei-Jie
    [J]. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 55 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [3] Causal inference in randomized clinical trials
    Cheng Zheng
    Ran Dai
    Robert Peter Gale
    Mei-Jie Zhang
    [J]. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2020, 55 : 4 - 8
  • [4] Sequential causal inference: Application to randomized trials of adaptive treatment strategies
    Dawson, Ree
    Lavori, Philip W.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (10) : 1626 - 1645
  • [5] Addressing missing data in randomized clinical trials: A causal inference perspective
    Cornelisz, Ilja
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Donker, Tara
    van Klaveren, Chris
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):
  • [6] Observational Studies Versus Randomized Controlled Trials: Avenues to Causal Inference in Nephrology
    Kovesdy, Csaba P.
    Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE, 2012, 19 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [7] Limits to causal inference based on mendelian randomization: A comparison with randomized controlled trials
    Nitsch, D
    Molokhia, M
    Smeeth, L
    DeStavola, BL
    Whittaker, JC
    Leon, DA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 163 (05) : 397 - 403
  • [8] Causal Inference and Estimands in Clinical Trials
    Lipkovich, Ilya
    Ratitch, Bohdana
    Mallinckrodt, Craig H.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (01): : 54 - 67
  • [9] Application of causal inference methods in the analyses of randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
    Farmer, Ruth E.
    Kounali, Daphne
    Walker, A. Sarah
    Savovic, Jelena
    Richards, Alison
    May, Margaret T.
    Ford, Deborah
    [J]. TRIALS, 2018, 19
  • [10] Application of causal inference methods in the analyses of randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
    Ruth E. Farmer
    Daphne Kounali
    A. Sarah Walker
    Jelena Savović
    Alison Richards
    Margaret T. May
    Deborah Ford
    [J]. Trials, 19