Feasibility and effects of preventive home visits for at-risk older people: Design of a randomized controlled trial

被引:13
|
作者
Cutchin M.P. [1 ]
Coppola S. [1 ]
Talley V. [2 ]
Svihula J. [3 ]
Catellier D. [4 ]
Shank K.H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Division of Occupational Science, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
[2] Orange County Department on Aging, Hillsborough, NC
[3] Institute on Aging, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
[4] Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
关键词
Life Satisfaction; Occupational Therapist; Satisfaction With Life Scale; Assisted Living; Skilled Nursing Facility;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2318-9-54
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The search for preventive methods to mitigate functional decline and unwanted relocation by older adults living in the community is important. Preventive home visit (PHV) models use infrequent but regular visits to older adults by trained practitioners with the goal of maintaining function and quality of life. Evidence about PHV efficacy is mixed but generally supportive. Yet interventions have rarely combined a comprehensive (biopsychosocial) occupational therapy intervention protocol with a home visit to older adults. There is a particular need in the USA to create and examine such a protocol. Methods/Design. The study is a single-blind randomized controlled pilot trial designed to assess the feasibility, and to obtain preliminary efficacy estimates, of an intervention consisting of preventive home visits to community-dwelling older adults. An occupational therapy-based preventive home visit (PHV) intervention was developed and is being implemented and evaluated using a repeated measures design. We recruited a sample of 110 from a population of older adults (75+) who were screened and found to be at-risk for functional decline. Participants are currently living in the community (not in assisted living or a skilled nursing facility) in one of three central North Carolina counties. After consent, participants were randomly assigned into experimental and comparison groups. The experimental group receives the intervention 4 times over a 12 month follow-up period while the comparison group receives a minimal intervention of mailed printed materials. Pre-and post-intervention measures are being gathered by questionnaires administered face-to-face by a treatment-blinded research associate. Key outcome measures include functional ability, participation, life satisfaction, self-rated health, and depression. Additional information is collected from participants in the experimental group during the intervention to assess the feasibility of the intervention and potential modifiers. Fidelity is being addressed and measured across several domains. Discussion. Feasibility indications to date are positive. Although the protocol has some limitations, we expect to learn enough about the intervention, delivery and effects to support a larger trial with a more stringent design and enhanced statistical power. Trial Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00985283. © 2009 Cutchin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preventive home visits to older people in Denmark: Methodology of a randomized controlled study
    Mikkel Vass
    Kirsten Avlund
    Carsten Hendriksen
    Christian K. Andersen
    Niels Keiding
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2002, 14 : 509 - 515
  • [2] Preventive home visits to older people in Denmark: Methodology of a randomized controlled study
    Vass, M
    Avlund, K
    Hendriksen, C
    Andersen, CK
    Keiding, N
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 14 (06) : 509 - 515
  • [3] Preventive home visits to promote the health-related quality of life of home-dwelling older people: Baseline findings and feasibility of a randomized, controlled trial
    Liimatta, H.
    Lampela, P.
    Laitinen-Parkkonen, P.
    Pitkala, K. H.
    EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2017, 8 (5-6) : 440 - 445
  • [4] Effects of a Preventive Home Visit Program in Ambulatory Frail Older People: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kono, Ayumi
    Kanaya, Yukiko
    Fujita, Tomoko
    Tsumura, Chieko
    Kondo, Tomoko
    Kushiyama, Kyoko
    Rubenstein, Laurence Z.
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 67 (03): : 302 - 309
  • [5] Preventive home visits for older people
    Stuck, AE
    Rubenstein, LZ
    AGE AND AGEING, 2001, 30 (05) : 424 - 425
  • [6] Risk assessment during preventive home visits among older people
    Fjell, Astrid
    Cronfalk, Berit Seiger
    Carstens, Nina
    Rongve, Arvid
    Kvinge, Lars M. Rosseland
    Seiger, Ake
    Skaug, Knut
    Bostrom, Anne-Marie
    JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2018, 11 : 609 - 620
  • [7] Effectiveness of preventive home visits in reducing the risk of falls in old age: a randomized controlled trial
    Luck, Tobias
    Motzek, Tom
    Luppa, Melanie
    Matschinger, Herbert
    Fleischer, Steffen
    Sesselmann, Yves
    Roling, Gudrun
    Beutner, Katrin
    Koenig, Hans-Helmut
    Behrens, Johann
    Riedel-Heller, Steffi G.
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2013, 8 : 697 - 702
  • [8] A Randomized Trial of Effects of Health Risk Appraisal Combined With Group Sessions or Home Visits on Preventive Behaviors in Older Adults
    Dapp, Ulrike
    Anders, Jennifer A. M.
    von Renteln-Kruse, Wolfgang
    Minder, Christoph E.
    Meier-Baumgartner, Hans Peter
    Swift, Cameron G.
    Gillmann, Gerhard
    Egger, Matthias
    Beck, John C.
    Stuck, Andreas E.
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 66 (05): : 591 - 598
  • [9] Effect of preventive home visits by a nurse on the outcomes of frail elderly people in the community: a randomized controlled trial
    Dalby, DM
    Sellors, JW
    Fraser, FD
    Fraser, C
    van Ineveld, C
    Howard, M
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2000, 162 (04) : 497 - 500
  • [10] Preventive home visits to older people in southern Sweden
    Theander, E
    Edberg, AK
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 33 (05) : 392 - 400