Portfolio optimization with optimal expected utility risk measures

被引:0
|
作者
S. Geissel
H. Graf
J. Herbinger
F. T. Seifried
机构
[1] University of Applied Sciences Trier,Faculty Business Administration and International Finance
[2] Nuertingen-Geislingen University,Department of Statistics
[3] Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich,Department IV – Mathematics
[4] University of Trier,undefined
来源
关键词
Optimal expected utility; Portfolio optimization; Risk measures; Value at risk; G11; D81;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this article is to evaluate optimal expected utility risk measures (OEU) in a risk-constrained portfolio optimization context where the expected portfolio return is maximized. We compare the portfolio optimization with OEU constraint to a portfolio selection model using value at risk as constraint. The former is a coherent risk measure for utility functions with constant relative risk aversion and allows individual specifications to the investor’s risk attitude and time preference. In a case study with three indices, we investigate how these theoretical differences influence the performance of the portfolio selection strategies. A copula approach with univariate ARMA-GARCH models is used in a rolling forecast to simulate monthly future returns and calculate the derived measures for the optimization. The results of this study illustrate that both optimization strategies perform considerably better than an equally weighted portfolio and a buy and hold portfolio. Moreover, our results illustrate that portfolio optimization with OEU constraint experiences individualized effects, e.g., less risk-averse investors lose more portfolio value in the financial crises but outperform their more risk-averse counterparts in bull markets.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 77
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Portfolio optimization with optimal expected utility risk measures
    Geissel, S.
    Graf, H.
    Herbinger, J.
    Seifried, F. T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 309 (01) : 59 - 77
  • [2] Optimal expected utility risk measures
    Geissel, Sebastian
    Sass, Joern
    Seifried, Frank Thomas
    [J]. STATISTICS & RISK MODELING, 2018, 35 (1-2) : 73 - 87
  • [3] Beyond expected utility: Subjective risk aversion and optimal portfolio choice under convex shortfall risk measures
    Brandtner, Mario
    Kuersten, Wolfgang
    Rischau, Robert
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 285 (03) : 1114 - 1126
  • [4] Optimal portfolio with vector expected utility
    Andre, Eric
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2014, 69 : 50 - 62
  • [5] TRACTABLE ROBUST EXPECTED UTILITY AND RISK MODELS FOR PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION
    Natarajan, Karthik
    Sim, Melvyn
    Uichanco, Joline
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 2010, 20 (04) : 695 - 731
  • [6] EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY, OPTIMAL PORTFOLIOS, AND POLYHEDRAL COHERENT RISK MEASURES
    Kirilyuk, V. S.
    [J]. CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, 2014, 50 (06) : 874 - 883
  • [7] Risk measures on networks and expected utility
    Cerqueti, Roy
    Lupi, Claudio
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 155 : 1 - 8
  • [8] Risk and utility in portfolio optimization
    Cohen, MH
    Natoli, VD
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2003, 324 (1-2) : 81 - 88
  • [9] From log-optimal portfolio theory to risk measures: logarithmic expected shortfall
    Arici, G.
    Dalai, M.
    Leonardi, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK, 2019, 22 (02): : 37 - 58
  • [10] Risk Measures and Portfolio Optimization
    Gambrah, Priscilla Serwaa Nkyira
    Pirvu, Traian Adrian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 7 (03): : 113 - 129