En bloc resection for locally advanced cancer of the pancreas: Is it worthwhile?

被引:0
|
作者
Aaron R. Sasson
John P. Hoffman
Eric A. Ross
Steven A. Kagan
James F. Pingpank
Burton L. Eisenberg
机构
[1] Fox Chase Cancer Center,Department of Surgical Oncology
[2] Fox Chase Cancer Center,Department of Biostatistics
[3] Temple University School of Medicine,Department of Surgery
来源
关键词
Extended resection; advanced pancreatic cancer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The benefit of radical surgical resection of contiguously involved structures for locally advanced pancreatic cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine patient outcome after extended pancreatic resection for locally advanced tumors and to determine if any subset of extended resection affected outcome. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 116 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, who underwent extirpative pancreatic surgery between 1987 and 2000. Of the 116 patients, 37 (32%) required resection of surrounding structures (group I), and 79 patients (68%) underwent standard pancreatic resections (group II). In all cases, all macroscopic disease was excised. In group I a total of 46 contiguously involved structures were resected: vascular in 25 patients (54%), mesocolon in 16 (35%) (colic vessels in 3, colon in 13), adrenal in three (7%), liver in one (2%), stomach in one (2%) (for a tumor in the tail of the pancreas), and multiple structures in four. Excision of regional blood vessels included the superior mesenteric vein and/or portal vein in 16, hepatic artery in five, and celiac axis in four. No differences between groups I and II were detected for any of the following parameters: age, sex, history of previous operation, estimated blood loss, or hospital stay. For the entire cohort the morbidity and mortality were 38% and 1.7%, respectively, and these rates were similar in the two groups. Adjuvant therapy was administered to more than 90% of patients in both groups. However, patients in group I were more likely to have received neoadjuvant therapy (76% vs. 42%, P = 0.001). Total pancreatectomy and distal pancreatectomy were more often performed in group I (P = 0.005). Additionally, the median operative time was longer (8.5 hours compared to 6.9 hours (P = 0.0004)). Both groups had similar rates of microscopically positive margins and involved lymph nodes, as well as total number of lymph nodes removed. The median survival was 26 months for patients in group I and 16 months for patients in group II (P = 0.08). The median disease-free survival for groups I and II was 16 months and 14 months, respectively (P = 0.88). In comparing patients in group I, who underwent vascular resection vs. mesocolon (colon or middle colic vessels) resection, the median survival was 26 months and 19 months, respectively (P = 0.12). We were unable to detect a difference in outcome for patients with locally advanced cancers requiring extended pancreatic resections compared to patients with standard resections. En bloc resection of involved surrounding structures, to completely extirpate all macroscopic disease, may be of benefit in selected patients with locally advanced disease, particularly when combined with preoperative chemoradiation therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 158
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] En bloc resection for locally advanced cancer of the pancreas: Is it worthwhile?
    Sasson, A
    Hoffman, JP
    Ross, EA
    Kagan, SA
    Pingpank, JF
    Eisenberg, BL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2002, 6 (02) : 147 - 157
  • [2] En bloc resection for locally advanced cancer of the pancreas: Is it worthwhile?
    Sasson, AR
    Hoffman, JP
    Ross, E
    Kagan, SA
    Pingpank, JF
    Eisenberg, BL
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 120 (05) : A106 - A106
  • [3] En bloc resection for locally advanced cancer of the pancreas: Is it worthwhile? Discussion
    Helton, WS
    Sasson
    Conlon
    Newman
    Bell, RH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2002, 6 (02) : 157 - 158
  • [4] EN BLOC RESECTION FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED CANCER OF THE PANCREAS IS THERE A BENEFIT?
    Bockhorn, M.
    Izbicki, J. R.
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 28 (6B) : 4020 - 4020
  • [5] Distal Pancreatectomy with En Bloc Celiac Resection for Locally Advanced Pancreas Carcinoma
    Nanashima, Atsushi
    Abo, Takafumi
    Tominaga, Tetsuro
    Fukuda, Akiko
    Kunizaki, Masaki
    To, Kazuo
    Takeshita, Hiroaki
    Hidaka, Shigekazu
    Nagayasu, Takeshi
    Sakamoto, Ichiro
    [J]. HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 59 (117) : 1341 - 1344
  • [6] EN BLOC RECTAL RESECTION COMBINED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED RECTAL CANCER
    Saito, N.
    Suzuki, T.
    Tanaka, T.
    Sugito, N.
    Ito, M.
    Kobayashi, A.
    Nishizawa, Y.
    Minagawa, N.
    Nishizawa, Y.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 : 107 - 108
  • [7] En bloc resection of the duodenum for locally advanced right colon adenocarcinoma
    Hakimi, Ahmad N.
    Rosing, David K.
    Stabile, Bruce E.
    Petrie, Beverley A.
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 2007, 73 (10) : 1063 - 1066
  • [8] Anterior-only Partial Sacrectomy for en bloc Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Roldan, Hector
    Perez-Orribo, Luis F.
    Plata-Bello, Julio M.
    Martin-Malagon, Antonio I.
    Garcia-Marin, Victor M.
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 4 (04) : 273 - 277
  • [9] En-bloc resection including SMV and duodenum in patient of locally advanced colon cancer
    Han, Jeong Hee
    Lee, Byoung Chul
    Noh, Byeong Gwan
    Park, Jae Kyun
    Choi, Jung Bum
    Park, Young Mok
    Jung, Hyuk Jae
    Jo, Hong Jae
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2023, 2023 (01):
  • [10] En-bloc Multivisceral Pelvic Resection for Locally Advanced Primary and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
    Ng, D.
    Chia, C.
    Tan, G.
    Teo, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 : S128 - S128