Root traits and yield in sugar beet: identification of AFLP markers associated with root elongation rate

被引:0
|
作者
Piergiorgio Stevanato
Daniele Trebbi
Massimo Saccomani
机构
[1] Università degli Studi di Padova,Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Agrarie
[2] Keygene N.V.,undefined
来源
Euphytica | 2010年 / 173卷
关键词
Edaphic stresses; Root apparatus; Quantitative trait loci; Sugar beet;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Morpho-physiological and molecular analysis were conducted to identify useful root indexes of sugar beet nutrient uptake capacity and productivity. Root architectural parameters, root elongation rate, sulfate uptake rate and glucose and fructose content in the root apex, traits involved in the plant response to sulfate stress, were evaluated in 18 sugar beet genotypes characterized by different root yield. Morpho-physiological traits, determined on 11-day-old seedlings grown in hydroponics under sulfate deprivation, showed variations from 59 to 197% and were significantly correlated (P < 0.01) with root yield. Under field conditions, the highest root yield genotype (L18), which has the highest root phenotypic values following sulfate shortage, also showed the greatest root length density and leaf relative water content, with respect to the lowest root yield genotype (L01). Bulk segregant analysis based on AFLP analysis, done on a segregating progeny obtained from the cross between the two lines L01 × L18, allowed the identification of two AFLP markers associated to the root elongation rate parameter that showed the highest variation among all the analyzed root traits. The genetic diversity of root adaptive traits and the use of marker-assisted selection aimed at increasing sugar yield under water and nutrient stress in sugar beet breeding programmes are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 298
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Root traits and yield in sugar beet: identification of AFLP markers associated with root elongation rate
    Stevanato, Piergiorgio
    Trebbi, Daniele
    Saccomani, Massimo
    EUPHYTICA, 2010, 173 (03) : 289 - 298
  • [2] Single nucleotide polymorphism markers linked to root elongation rate in sugar beet
    Stevanato, P.
    Trebbi, D.
    Saccomani, M.
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2017, 61 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [3] Quantitative effect of root/leaf growth rate on root yield and quality parameters in sugar beet
    Maslaris, N
    Christodoulou, P
    Zountsas, G
    ZUCKERINDUSTRIE, 1997, 122 (03): : 208 - 211
  • [4] Root traits and competitiveness against weeds in sugar beet
    Stevanato, P.
    Trebbi, D.
    Bertaggia, M.
    Colombo, M.
    Broccanello, C.
    Concheri, G.
    Saccomani, M.
    INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 2011, 113 (1351): : 497 - 501
  • [5] Changes in root morphology with yield level of sugar beet
    Hoffmann, Christa M.
    SUGAR INDUSTRY-ZUCKERINDUSTRIE, 2017, 142 (07): : 420 - 425
  • [6] ASSESSMENT OF SUGAR BEET ROOT YIELD BY AMMI ANALYSIS
    Ciric, Mihajlo
    Curcic, Iyko
    Mirosavljevic, Milan
    Marjanovic Jeromela, Ana
    Jacimovic, Goran
    Prodanovic, Slaven
    Zivanovic, Tomislav
    GENETIKA-BELGRADE, 2017, 49 (02): : 663 - 675
  • [7] ROOT YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET INVESTIGATED HYBRIDS
    Kristek, A.
    Kristek, Suzana
    Glavas-Tokic, Renata
    Antunovic, Manda
    Rasic, Sanda
    Resic, I
    Varga, Ivana
    POLJOPRIVREDA, 2013, 19 (01): : 33 - 40
  • [8] INFLUENCE OF VARIETY AND BIOPREPARATIONS ON ROOT YIELD, SUGAR CONTENT AND POLARIZED SUGAR YIELD OF SUGAR BEET
    Pacuta, Vladimr
    Kasickova, Ivana
    Rasovsky, Marek
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2015, 131 (5-6): : 168 - 171
  • [9] ROOT YIELD, SUGAR CONTENT AND WHITE SUGAR YIELD IN DEPENDENCE ON YEAR AND SUGAR BEET VARIETY
    Cerny, Ivan
    Pacuta, Vladimir
    Ernst, David
    Zapletalova, Alexandra
    Rasovsky, Marek
    Sulik, Richard
    Buso, Rastislav
    Gazo, Jan
    Pincek, Ondrej
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2021, 137 (5-6): : 204 - 208
  • [10] INFLUENCE OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SUGAR BEET ROOT YIELD AND QUALITY
    Kristek, Suzana
    Kristek, Andrija
    Evacic, Martin
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 36 : 371 - 374